期刊文献+

头孢哌酮钠/舒巴坦钠防治妇产科感染531例疗效观察 被引量:7

Clinical Observation on 531 Cases of Infections in Obstetrics and Gynecology Treated with Cefoperazon Sodium/Sulbactam Sodium.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价注射用头孢哌酮钠/舒巴坦钠预防和治疗妇产科感染的安全性和有效性。方法按照卫生部颁发的"抗菌药物临床研究指导原则"进行临床观察,与头孢他啶随机对照,比较注射用头孢哌酮钠/舒巴坦钠每次1.5g每12h 1次(轻度);1.5g每8h 1次(中度);3.0g每8h 1次(重度);预防治疗妇产科感染的临床疗效和安全性。结果试验组的临床痊愈率57.06%(303/531)高于对照组49.02%(225/459),其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组有效率分别为91.53%(486/531)和84.10%(386/459),细菌清除率分别为90.59%(414/457)和81.06%(321/396),(P<0.05),临床研究中未发现试验药物的严重不良反应。结论注射用头孢哌酮钠/舒巴坦钠对预防和治疗妇产科感染和手术后预防感染安全有效。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of cefoperazone sodium and Sulbactam Sodium in the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections in obstetrics and gynecology. Methods The clinical observation was done according to the criteria for clinical research of antibiotics issued by the National Health Ministry. A randomized controlled clinical trial on efficacy and safety of cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium vs ceftazidime at 1.5g every 12h (mild) and 1.5g every 8h (moderate) and 3.0g every 8h (serious) was conducted to prevent or treat bacterial infections. Results The curative rate of 57.06% (303/531) in the test group increased significantly (P 〈 0.05 ) as comparted with 49.02% (225/459) in control group. While significant differences were found in the efficacy rate 91.53% (486/531) vs 84.10% (386/459) and the bacterial clearance rate 90.59% (414/457) vs 81.06% (321/396) between the two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). There was no serious adverse drug reaction associated with trial drug in the clinical trial. Conclusion The injection of cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium is effective and safe for the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections in obstetrics and gynecology.
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2010年第2期84-87,共4页 Journal of Medical Research
关键词 头孢哌酮钠 舒巴坦钠 妇产科 细菌感染 预防和治疗 Cefoperazone Sulbactam Obstetrics and gynecoloy Bacterial infections Prevention and treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1汪复.2006年中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2008,8(1):1-9. 被引量:281
  • 2Kumamoto Y, Tsukamoto T, Matsukawa M, et al. comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from patients with urinary tract infections (2004) III, secular changes in susceptibility [ J ]. JPn J Antibiat ,2006, 59 (4) :217 - 315.
  • 3Wu CM, Cao JL, Zheng MH, et al. Effect and mechanism of andrographolide on the recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility to several antibiotics [J]. J Int Med Res, 2008, 36 (1) :178 -186.
  • 4周晨霞,张瑞忠,陆志军,王志忠,徐振亚.尿路感染患者病原菌分布及耐药趋势分析[J].中国药房,2008,19(8):586-588. 被引量:12
  • 5Tofteland S, Haldorsen B, Dahl KH, et al. Effect of phenotype and genotype on methods for detection of extended - spectrum - beta - lactamase - producing clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and klebsiella - pneumoniae in Norway [J]. J clin Microbial, 2007, 45 (1) :199 -205.
  • 6Ong CT, Tessier PR, Li C, et al. Comparative in vivo efficacy of meropenem, imipenem and cefepime against pseudomonas aeruginosa expressing Mex A, Mex B, Opr M efflux pumps [ J ]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2007, 57(2) :153 -161.
  • 7Ishii Y, Tateda K, Yamaguchi K. Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility for beta - lactams using the Etest method against clinical isolates from 100 medical centers in Japan (2006) [J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2008, 60(2) :177 -183.
  • 8Mlynarczyk G, Mlynarezyk A, wysocka PC, et al. Assessment of the susceptibility of the gram - negative rods isolated from hospitalized patients to cefoperazone / sulbactam [ J ]. Med Dosw Mikrobiol, 2008, 60(1) :51 -58.
  • 9罗裕清,刘小乐,黄海玉.头孢哌酮钠/舒巴坦钠防治妇产科感染临床比较研究[J].中国现代药物应用,2009,3(11):28-29. 被引量:5
  • 10樊新,徐修礼,孙怡群,胡晓卫.头孢吡肟对铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌体外抗菌活性研究[J].中国药物与临床,2007,7(4):273-274. 被引量:1

二级参考文献32

共引文献292

同被引文献58

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部