期刊文献+

CD105和CD34染色在Ⅰ-Ⅱ期直肠癌组织新生血管检测中的差异及其意义 被引量:1

Prognostic value of microvessel density in rectal carcinoma at stages Ⅰ to Ⅱ:comparison between anti-CD34 antibody and anti-CD105 antibody
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较以CD105和CD34为血管内皮细胞标记物在早期直肠癌新生血管中表达的差异,探讨CD105-微血管密度(MVD)作为Ⅰ-Ⅱ期直肠癌预后预测指标的可能性。方法分别应用抗CD105、CD34抗体对380例Ⅰ-Ⅱ期直肠癌组织微血管进行免疫组织化学标记,多因素回归分析CD105-MVD、CD34-MVD与早期直肠癌肝转移及预后的相关性。结果CD105在直肠癌新生微血管中特异性表达,在正常组织的血管无表达,而CD34在肿瘤及正常组织的大小血管中均广泛表达,两者表达率有显著性差异(P<0.001);CD105-MVD与肿瘤浸润深度、病理组织类型、肝转移率呈正相关。多因素分析表明CD105-MVD是影响全组直肠癌预后的独立因素,CD105-MVD高表达时患者死亡的危险度是低表达患者的3.032倍(95%CI=1.481-6.804)。而CD34-MVD与直肠癌的预后无明显相关性。结论CD105是一种较CD34更有特异性的肿瘤性血管内皮细胞标记物,CD105抗体标记的肿瘤微血管密度可作为预测早期直肠癌预后的重要分子生物学指标。 Objective To investigate the difference and significance of CD105 and CD34 in detecting new born blood vessels in rectal carcinoma at early stage.Methods Tumor tissues from 380 potentially resected rectal cancer patients in pathological stages Ⅰ-Ⅱ were analyzed for MVD by immunohistochemical S-P method with anti CD105 and CD 34 antibody respectively.Logistic analysis was used to detect the relevance of CD105-MVD,CD34-MVD and liver metastases,prognosis in early rectal carcinoma.Results Newborn blood vessels and normal blood vessels could be clearly distinguished in CD105 stained slides,but not in CD34 stained slides.The detection of MVD marked by CD34 was obviously higher than that marked by CD105 in rectal carcinoma.Multivariate analysis revealed that CD105-MDV but not CD34-MDV was a independent indicator to predict probability of hepatic metastasis and poor prognosis of rectal carcinoma with phaseⅠ-Ⅱ.The cases positive for CD105-MVD had a significantly hazard ratio (95%CI) for death from early rectal carcinoma for 3.032 (1.481-6.804).Conclusion CD105 is more suitable than CD34 in studying the newborn blood vessels of rectal cancer.Detecting the expression of CD105-MVD may help to predict clinical outcome and design further individualized intensive adjuvant treatment.
出处 《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》 CAS 2010年第2期111-116,共6页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
基金 福建省自然基金资助项目(2009J01147)
关键词 直肠癌 预后 CD105 CD34 微血管密度 Rectal carcinoma Prognosis CD105 CD34 Microvessel density
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Rajaganeshan R, Prasad R, Guillou PJ, et al. The influence of invasire growth pattern and microvessel density on prognosis in eoloreetal cancer and colorectal liver metastases [ J]. Br J Cancer, 2007, 96 (7) : 1112-1117.
  • 2周永建,宛凤玲,姚丽华,冯丽雅.细胞周期蛋白E对直肠癌预后判断的价值及与血管侵袭的相关性[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2008,11(2):167-171. 被引量:4
  • 3Compton CC, Green FL. The staging of colorectal cancer: 2004 and beyond [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2004, 54(6): 295-308.
  • 4Cooper HS, Slemmer JR. Surgical pathology of carcinoma of the colon and rectum [J]. Semin Oncol, 1991, 18(4) : 367-380.
  • 5Chandler I, Houlston RS. Interobserver agreement in grading of colorectal cancers-findings from a nationwide web-based survey of histopathologists [ J]. Histopathology, 2008, 52(4): 494-499.
  • 6Shi L, Chen XM, Wang L, et al. Expression of caveolin-1 in mueoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands: correlation with vascular endothelial growth factor, microvessel density, and clinical outcome [J]. Cancer, 2007, 109(8) : 1523-1531.
  • 7Mineo TC, Ambrogi V, Baldi A, et al. Prognostic impact of VEGF, CD31, CD34, and CD105 expression and tumour vessel invasion afar radical surgery for ⅠB-ⅡA non-small cell lung cancer [ J ]. J Clin Pathol, 2004, 57 (6) : 591-597.
  • 8Wang X, Hershman DL, Abrams JA, et al. Predictors of survival after hepatic resection among patients with colorectal liver metastasis [ J]. Br J Cancer, 2007, 97(12) : 1606-1612.
  • 9Dallas NA, Samuel S, Xia L, et al. Endoglin (CD105) : a marker of tumor vasculature and potential target for therapy [ J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2008, 14(7): 1931-1937.
  • 10Svagzdys S, Lesauskaite V, Pavalkis D, et al. Microvessrl density as new prognostic marker after radiotherapy in rectal canner [ J]. BMC Cancer, 2009, 26(9) : 95.

二级参考文献10

  • 1兰斌,刘炳亚,张济,王侃侃,陈雪华,朱正纲.胃癌细胞周期G1/S转换期基因表达谱的分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(3):229-233. 被引量:5
  • 2赵东兵,高纪东,单毅,周志祥,袁兴华,吴健雄,邵永孚.结肠癌根治术后转移复发的特点及预后分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(4):291-293. 被引量:36
  • 3Keyomarsi K, Tucker SL, Buchholz TA ,et al. Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347 : 1566-1575.
  • 4Bani-Hani KE, Almasri NM, Khader YS, et al. Combined evaluation of expressions of cyclin E and PS3 proteins as prognostic factors for patients with gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Bes, 2005,11 : 1447-1453.
  • 5Lim YJ, Kim YH, Ahn GH, et ai. Cyclin E ,P27 and mutant P53 do not predict the prognosis in AJCC stage Ⅱ colorectal carcinomas. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2004,44 : 314- 320.
  • 6Sobin LH, Wittekind C, eds. TMN classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. UICC International Union Against Cancer. New York : Wiley-Liss, 2002 : 227.
  • 7Bruce AH, Louise G, John EN. Colon and Rectum. In: Martin DA, James OA, Allen SL, et al. Clinical oncology, 2nd ed. Livingstone: Harcourt Asia Churchill, 2001 : 1618.
  • 8顾晋,主译.下消化道肿瘤学.第1版.北京:北京大学出版社.2004:66-67.
  • 9Akli S, Zheng PJ, Multani AS, et ai. Tumor-specific low molecular weight forms of cyclin E induce genomic instability and resistance to P21, P27, and antiestrogens in breast cancer. Cancer Res, 2004,64: 3198-3208.
  • 10Rajagopalan H, Jailepaili PV, Rago C, et ai. Inactivation of hCDC4 can cause chromosomal instability. Nature, 2004,428:77-81.

共引文献3

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部