规则·模型·建筑学研究方法——构成性与生成性辨析

Rule·Model·Architectural Research Method——Discrimination between Composition and Generation

在讨论建筑学研究方法时,对于设计和研究的关系一直存在着构成性和生成性的争论,即"以设计为研究"和"进入研究中的设计"两种观点,在方法上体现为"规则中心"和"模型中心"。以规则作为研究中心的传统建筑学体现出构成性,这种趋势使得建筑学设计和研究分离,并使具体研究分裂为科学和哲学、文艺的两极,学科的自主性遭到破坏。而生成性则是"以设计为研究"的一种方法论,以模型尤其是以动态模型为中心,能够在具体环境下消解"规则中心"的矛盾,从而更好地联系设计与研究,恢复建筑学的自主。

In discussing architectural research methods, there have always been a controversy between the relationship of design and research, which is demonstrated as ＂research guided by design＂ and ＂research with design included＂ , as embodied in methods as ＂rule centered＂ and ＂model centered＂ . Rule-centered traditional architectural research reflects the composition of the world, which separates architectural design and research and also splits specific studies into two extremes, i.e. science and philosophy, literature and art. As a result, the discipline autonomy was damaged. Model centered, especially dynamic model centered generation, which is the methodology defined by research guided design, can remove rule centered contradictions in specific circumstances. In this way, generation can improve the links between design and research, and thus the autonomy of artechture can be resumed.