期刊文献+

20世纪美国应对机动性的交通构想及高速公路发展历程 被引量:3

Planning for Cars in Cities:Planners,Engineers,and Freeways in the 20th Century
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了阐述20世纪除汽车机动性外,交通发展经历的最重要的进程——城市高速公路的出现,考察了过去100年来美国城市交通规划的历史。通过回顾各种研究资料,认为资助州际公路发展所采用的方法使联邦和州公路工程师成为主管,这影响了公路的选线及设计。联邦公路工程师只关注机动车通过效率的最大化,而在很大程度上忽略了城市的其他利害关系。没有先进的规划理念指导、过度建设、稀疏、放射环状的道路网对于加强机动性取得了极大的效益,但通常要为此付出巨大的社会和环境成本。最后指出,在实践中要重新审视具有百年历史的协调交通与土地利用规划的观点,而且,公共财政权宜之计式的政治决策方式将对工程、出行和城市形态产生深远的影响。 We consider the history of U.S. urban transportation plan- ning over the past 100 years, to explain the evolution and legacy of the single most important transportation development of the past century save automobility itself: the emergence of the urban fi'eeway. We reviewed primary and secondary material, including plans, manuscripts, newspaper accounts, and scholarly articles and books. We ar-gue that the method used to fund interstate highway development put federal and state highway engineers in charge, and this affected highways' location and design. State highway engineers imposed a narrow, traffic-service oriented vision on metropolitan freeways that focused on maximizing vehicle throughput and largely ignored other urban concerns. With too little advance thought, overbuilt, sparse, ring-radial networks were routed through neighborhoods in cities around the country, often at great social and environmental cost. Though the system has undeniably conferred great benefits in terms of enhanced mobility, the costs have been high as well. A century-old vision of coordinated transportation and land use planning has resur- faced in practice, but in the meantime politically expedient decisionsabout public finance have had unanticipated, but profound and long-lasting effects on projects, travel, and urban form.
出处 《城市交通》 2010年第1期81-94,共14页 Urban Transport of China
关键词 城市高速公路 规划史 交通 urban freeway plan-ning history transportation
  • 相关文献

参考文献78

  • 1McShane C, Tarr J A. The Centrality of the Horse in the Nineteenth Century American City[M]// R A Mohl. The Making of Urban America. New York: SR Publishers, 1997:105 - 130.
  • 2Morris E A. From Horse Power to Horsepower[J]. Access, 2007(30): 2 - 9.
  • 3Committee on the District of Columbia, United States Senate. Hearing before the Committee on the District of Columbia, United States Senate on the Subject of City Planning[C]// Proceedings of the First National Conference on City Planning (1910).Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1910.
  • 4Brown J. From Traffic Regulation to Limited Ways: The Effort to Build a Science of Transportation Planning[J]. Journal of Planning History, 2006, 5 (1): 3 - 34.
  • 5Bartholomew H. Relation of Roadway Widths and Transit Lines to Street Traffic[J]. American City, 1924, 30 (5): 474 - 476.
  • 6Harland Bartholomew and Associates. A Proposed Plan for a System of Major Traffic Highways: Oakland, California[R]. St Louis MO: Harland Bartholomew and Associates, 1927.
  • 7Nolen J. A Report on a Major Street Plan for the City of San Diego, California[R]. San Diego CA: City Planning Commission, 1930.
  • 8Olmsted F L, Bartholomew H, Cheney C. A Major Traffic Street Plan for Los Angeles[R]. Los Angeles CA: Olmsted F L, Bartholomew H, Cheney C, 1924.
  • 9Knowles M. City Planning as a Permanent Solution of the Traffic Problem[C]// Planning Problems of Town, City and Region: Papers and Discussions at the International City and Regional Planning Conference. New York: Norman, Remington Co., 1925:48 - 62.
  • 10McClintock M. The Traffic Survey[M]//MacDonald A F. Planning for City Traffic: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1927:8 - 18.

同被引文献169

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部