期刊文献+

论反垄断法执法主体的设置——从执法权分配角度分析 被引量:4

On the subject of anti-monopoly law enforcement setting——From the perspective of law enforcement power distribution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 市场经济的核心在于维护一个公平有效的竞争机制,而反垄断法因其在保护、促进竞争和维护市场秩序方面起着基础和统领作用,被誉为"经济宪法"。徒法不足以自行,光有一部精良先进的法律条文是不够的,还得通过法的实施,方能实现法的效果。在法律实施机构之间划分执法权,是法律实施体制中其他制度运行的前提,对于法律的有效实施有着重要的意义。本文主要从执法权划分角度探讨反垄断法实施体制中执法主体的设置,以及执法机构与行业监管机构在反垄断监管领域内的关系,通过比较国外的法律规定及实践,并对我国实施不久的《反垄断法》进行评述,综合分析中国现有反垄断执法主体执法权分配中存在的问题,进而提出完善我国现有反垄断执法主体体制的建议。 Of the market economy lies in maintaining a fair and effective competition,while its anti-monopoly law to protect,promote competition and maintain market order plays a role in the foundation and guide,known as "economic constitution."The law does not own,the light has a well-advanced law is not enough.it is through implementation of the law can only achieve the effect of law.Divided between law enforcement agencies in the law enforcement authority,the law enforcement system to run other systems,a prerequisite for the effective implementation of the law has an important significance.In this paper,from the enforcement division of the right perspective of the main anti-monopoly law enforcement in the implementation of the institutional settings,as well as law enforcement agencies and industry.regulatory agencies in the anti-monopoly regulation in the field of relationship, by comparing the foreign law and practice,and China's implementation of the near "anti-monopoly law,"is reviewed,a comprehensive analysis of China's current anti-monopoly law enforeement law enforcement power distribution of the main problems in making further improve China's current anti-monopoly law enforcement of the main system's recommendations.
作者 刘达
出处 《行政与法》 2010年第2期26-29,共4页 Administration and Law
关键词 反垄断法 执法主体 执法权划分 Anti-monopoly law the main enforcement planning the allocation of enforcement powers
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献38

  • 1马克.威廉姆斯,林立新,谢军晖,纪文华.欧盟竞争法对中国竞争立法的启示[J].法学评论,1999,17(6):1-6. 被引量:5
  • 2萨缪尔森 经济学 萧琛 译.诺德豪斯[M].北京:华夏出版社,1998.230.
  • 3[美]W·E·哈拉尔.新资本主义[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1999.320.
  • 4曹士兵.反垄断法研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1997.253.
  • 5Professionals take leading role in top legislature[J]. Beijing Review P35 MAR.27,2003.
  • 6吉尔霍思 称瓦西克 王晓晔 译.反垄断法律与经济[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.449.
  • 7李军鹏.市场经济史上政府职能的三次演变[J].江西行政学院学报,2000,(1).
  • 8转引自 王传纶 高培勇.当代西方财政经济理论(上)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1995.127-129.
  • 9Eliot G.Disner,Antitrust law for Business lawyers,Second Edition,2003,p.92.
  • 10E.Gellhorn/W.E.Kovacic/S.Calkins,Antitrust Law and Economics,In a Nut Sell,Fifth Edition,P.527.

共引文献90

同被引文献17

  • 1孟庆瑜.论中国经济法的特殊使命及其完善[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2005,33(3):126-131. 被引量:3
  • 2王涛.反洗钱信息中心的性质有待明确[J].中国人大,2006(9):14-14. 被引量:1
  • 3周汉华.监管机构与反垄断机构的权力配置[N].中国经济时报,2001-06-22.
  • 4孙涛.欧盟竞争法对我国反垄断立法的几点启示.http://www.hicourt.gov.cn..2002-4-28.
  • 5VonKalinowski(ed).WorldLawofCompetition,Germany,1987.15-23.
  • 6ABA.AntitrustLawSpecialCommittee.Report of The Role of FTC,58 Antitrust L.J.53,April 5,1989.
  • 7王建东,陈林林主编.《法理学》,浙江大学出版社,2008年,第9页.
  • 8[德]卡尔.位伦茨:《德国民法总论》,王晓哗等译,法律出版社2003年版,第119-120页.
  • 9汪全胜:《食品安全监管失灵的症结》,载《中国审判》2011年第5期.
  • 10周汉华.监管机构与反垄断机构的权力配置,2001.

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部