核心期刊现行数据统计源合理性的讨论

Study on Rationality of the Statistical Source Adopted in Core Journal Evaluation System

核心(或来源)期刊评价系统采用的数据统计源通常是另一家核心(或来源)期刊遴选体系的来源期刊,导致期刊一旦被统计源收录,其自引部分就可对影响因子、总被引频次等指标起到正面影响,同时还可提高"获国家奖或被国内外重要检索工具收录"等指标值,形成被收录的期刊指标更高未被收录的期刊指标更低的马太效应。针对该现象,以国内某核心期刊评价系统的统计源为例,探讨统计源选择对期刊影响因子、总被引频次、获国家奖或被国内外重要检索工具收录等指标的影响,进而指明对其综合评价值及期刊排名的影响。

The statistical source adopted in core journal evaluation system usually are the source journals of anther core journal evaluation system.If a journal was indexed,its self- citation could have positive influence on impact factor,total cites and the number of prize own by the journal or number of major retrieval tools covering the journal.So the indices of the indexed journals are higher than that of un - indexed ones,and the Matthew Effect are formed.According to that phenomenon,the influence of statistical source on impact factor,total cites and the number of prize by the journal or number of major retrieval tools covering the journal were studied and then the influence on the comprehensive evaluation value and journal ranking were designated with one national core journal evaluation system as an example.