期刊文献+

腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在经阴道子宫切除术中的应用 被引量:11

Application of Spinal-Epidural Anesthesin in Trans-Vaginal Hysterectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经阴道子宫切除术时采用腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉(combined spinal epidural anesthesia,CSEA)与持续硬膜外麻醉(continuous epidural anesthesia,CEA)对血流动力学影响,局麻药用量、阻滞起效时间、临床效果评价等。方法将2009年1月至2009年9月上海市第一妇婴保健院手术室择期行阴道子宫切除术患者80例,随机分为两组:CEA组(n=40)和CSEA组(n=40)(本研究遵循的程序符合同济大学附属第一妇婴保健医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。两组患者一般情况比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。分别观察、比较CEA,CSEA两组患者麻醉穿刺成功后椎管内注射局部麻醉药5 min,10 min,15 min,30 min及术毕时的血压、平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率、静脉血氧饱和度、局麻药用量、麻醉阻滞平面达T8的时间,术中肌组织松弛满意度、术后头痛发生率等。结果两组患者血流动力学比较,CSEA组平均动脉压显著低于CEA组(P<0.05),CSEA组阻滞平面达T8明显快于CEA组(P<0.01),CSEA组局部麻醉药用量明显少于CEA组(P<0.05),CSEA组肌组织松弛满意度优于CEA组(P<0.05)。结论就经阴道子宫切除术而言,腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉是经阴道子宫切除术的一种理想的麻醉方法。 Objective To compare the anesthetic effects and hemodynamic changes between combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CESA) and continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) in trans vaginal hysterectomy. Methods From January to September 2009, 80 patients who were underwent trans vagina hysterectomy were randomly divided into two groups, CSEA group (n=40) and CEA group (n=40). Informed consent was obtained from all participates. There had no significant difference of the general situation between two groups(P〉0.05). In CEA group, epidural anesthesia was established using (20-30) mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, whereas spinal anesthesia was performed using (2.0-3.0) mL hyperbaric 0.75G bupivacaine in CSEA group. The blood pressure, heart rate, Spo2 were monitored continuously during surgery. The changes of hemodynamic, anesthetic dosage, times of sensory block to T8, degrees of motor block and muscle relaxation, and postoperative headache were measured and analyzed. Results The mean arterial pressure(MAP) of CSEA group was significant lower than that of CEA group(P〈0.05), times of sensory block to T8 was quicker in CSEA group than that of CEA group (P〈0.01), anesthetic dosage of CSEA group was lower than that of CEA group (P〈0.05), and muscle relaxation and motor block were much better in CSEA group (P〈0. 05). Conclusion Compared with continuous epidural anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia is a perfect anesthetic option for trans vaginal hysterectomy with smaller anesthetic dosages, quicker onset time and reliable muscle relaxation.
出处 《中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2010年第1期29-32,共4页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition)
关键词 腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉 持续硬膜外麻醉 经阴道子宫切除术 combined spinal epidural anesthesia(CSEA) continuous epidural anesthesia(CEA) trans vaginal hysterectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1郑颖梅,沈跃华,程建新,徐建国.罗比卡因等比重液用于老年病人腰-硬联合阻滞的临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(3):174-176. 被引量:84
  • 2吴超英,任利容,王泽华.罗哌卡因用于分娩镇痛对产程和分娩方式的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(6):369-371. 被引量:95
  • 3夏军.罗比卡因腰-硬联合麻醉在高龄患者下腹部及下肢手术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(12):859-859. 被引量:57
  • 4Lepine LA, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, et al. Hysterectomy surveillance- United States, 1980 - 1993. Mor Mortal Wkly Rep CDC Surveill Summ, 1997,46( 1 ) :1.
  • 5Reich H,Decaprio J, McGlyn K. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg, 1989,5(4) :213.
  • 6Nwosu CR, Gupta JK. Abdominal, laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophoreetomy: a feasibility study for further evaluation in randomized trials. Surg Endose, 1999, 13(9) : 148.
  • 7Shao JB, Wong F. Factors influencing the choice of hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol,2001,41(3) :303.
  • 8Hidlebaugh DA. Cost and quality-of-life issues associated with different surgical therapies for the treatment of abonormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am,2000,27(2) :451.
  • 9Young W, Cohen MM. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy- a review of current issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 1997,13(2) :368.
  • 10Lowell L, Kessler AA. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy- a suitable substitute for abdominal hysterectomy? J Reprod Med, 2000,45 (9) : 738.

共引文献259

同被引文献59

引证文献11

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部