摘要
在中国对美国部分汽车和鸡肉产品已经发起"双反调查"(反倾销和反补贴调查的同时进行)的情况下,根据《SCM协定》规定的补贴定义,严格考察我国《反补贴条例》所规定的补贴定义与国际法规定的一致性,指出后者的错误所在,建议将其修正为"补贴是一个国家的政府和公共机构通过提供财政资助为接受者所带来的利益"。
Under the situation of the investigations of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy launched by China against part of automobiles and chicken products exported from the United States, the author conscientiously analyzes the definition of subsidy formulated in China's Anti-subsidy Regulations and discovers the inconsistency between it and the subsidy definition provided in SCM Agreement. In conclusion, the author points out the mistake and suggests subsidy be considered as the benefits brought to the recipients through financial contribution of the government or public institutions.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期38-41,共4页
Hebei Law Science
基金
汕头大学文科科研基金<中国的经济转型与美国对华反补贴调查>(110-074063)
关键词
补贴定义
SCM协定
《反补贴条例》
the definition of subsidy
SCM Agreement
China's Anti-subsidy Regulations