从几个假定看朱忠喜案一审的非理性倾向

The Irrational Tendency in the First Instance of ZHU Zhong-xi Case——om the Perspective of a Number of Assumptions

2008年12月29日,河南省开封市古建彩绘公司职工朱忠喜因砍伤准备入室盗窃或抢劫的歹徒黎永吉,被开封市龙亭区法院一审判处有期徒刑3年,赔偿黎永吉各项损失51160.46元。此案的判决看似合乎法理,但是,如果对本案进行几种不同进程、不同性质及其效应的假定,那么就可以清楚地看到,本案的司法结果是背离了法律的立法宗旨,错误理解了法律的公平与公正。

December 29, 2008, Kaifeng Long Ting District Court sentenced ZHU Zhong-xi, an employee of an ancient architecture painting company in Henan province, to 3 years in prison and to compensate the criminal LI Yong-ji loss of 51 160.46 Yuan in first instance because the former chopped the latter, who attempted to burglarize or rob. The sentence appeared to be legitimate, but if we are to carry out a number of different assumptions with different processes, nature and effect in this case, we will see clearly that the judicial outcome of this case is a departure from legislative purpose of law and is a wrong interpretation of the equity and justice of law, and thus should be corrected.