论作为教育权力的“灌输”

On the "indoctrination" as an Educational Power

迄今为止,对"灌输论"最有力的质疑是"不道德论"。"不道德论"的立论是"无灌输道德教育","国家对道德中立"和"教育中立"是其理论支柱,是代表着自由主义立场的教育思想。面对着自由主义教育理论对"灌输论"的质疑,任何语义上的辨析都是徒劳的,因为自由主义教育理论在本质上质疑任何教育权力,反对任何意义上的"灌输"。因此,任何对"灌输论"立场的退缩,都是在向自由主义教育靠拢,同时也就是放弃对马克思主义教育权力观点的坚持。

So far, the strong challenge to the ＂indoctrination＂ theory is ＂immoral theory. ＂ The argument of ＂Immoral theory＂ was ＂no indoctrination moral education＂, the ＂national neutrality to moral＂ and ＂Education neutrality＂ are its theoretical pillars, that on behalf of the education thought of the liberal position. Facing the challenge of liberal educational theory to the ＂indoctrination＂ theory, any semantic analysis is futile, because the liberal educational theory, in essence, to challenge any educational authority is certainly opposed to any sense of ＂indoctrination＂. Therefore, any back down to the position of ＂indoctrination＂ theory are closer to the liberal education, but also means giving up the persistence in view of the education power of the Marxist.