期刊文献+

双柏膏外敷在肝穿刺活检术后的止痛疗效观察 被引量:1

Analgesic Efficacy of External Application of Shuangbai Ointment after Liver Biopsy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨双柏膏外敷在肝穿刺活检术后的止痛效果,并与西药止痛剂作对比。方法将102例肝穿刺活检后患者分为治疗组(51例)和对照组(51例),治疗组使用双柏膏外敷,对照组使用西药止痛剂。记录两组患者治疗前后的疼痛强度及用药后的不良反应,归纳总结并作对比。结果在止痛效果方面,两组止痛疗效相近,但治疗组完全缓解率和明显缓解率均略高于对照组,差异无统计学意义;在不良反应方面,治疗组仅个别患者有局部皮肤潮红、水泡、轻度瘙痒反应,发生率极低(1例,占1.96%);对照组则见有头晕、呕吐、腹胀、便秘等不良反应,且发生率相对较高。结论对于肝穿刺活检术后疼痛患者,使用双柏膏肝区外敷能够简单、有效地控制疼痛,且不良反应极少。 Objective To investigate the analgesic efficacy of external application of shuangbai ointment after liver biopsy, and compare with the western medicine analgesic effect. Methods 102 cases of patients after liver biopsy were divided into treatment group (51 cases) and control group (51 cases). Shuanghai ointment was used in the treatment group for external application and western medicine analgesics were used in the control group to record, summarize and compare the pain intensity in the two groups before and after treatment and the adverse reactions after treatment of the patients. Results The analgesic effect, analgesic efficacy of the two groups were similar, but the complete remission rate and remission rate in treatment group were slightly higher than those in the control group without statistically signifi- cant difference; in adverse reaction, individual patients in the treatment group had local skin flush, blisters, mild itching reaction, with low ineidenee (one ease, accounting for 1.96%); in the control group, the patients were seen with dizziness, vomiting, abdominal distension, constipation and other adverse reactions with relatively higher incidence of adverse reactions. Conclusion For patients with postoperative pain after the liver biopsy, external application of shuangbai ointment can be simple, effective in control of pain with very few adverse reactions.
作者 蒋应玲
出处 《临床医学工程》 2010年第2期24-25,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 双柏膏 肝穿刺活检术后 止痛 护理 Shuangbai ointment After liver biopsy Analgesic efficacy Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 1[1]FISAHMAN B,PASTERNAK S,WALLENSTEIN SL,et al.The memorial pain assessment card[J].Cancer,1987,60:1151- 1158.
  • 2[2]RHIND VM,BIRD NA, WRIGHT V.A comparison of clinical assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis[J].Annals of the Rheumatic Disease,1980,39:135- 137.
  • 3[3]HUSKISSON EC,JONE J,SCOTT PJ.Application of visual analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity[J].Rheumatology and Rehabilitation,1976,15:185- 187.
  • 4[4]DOWNIE WW,LEATHAM PA,RHIND VM.Studies with pain rating scales[J].Annals of the Rheumatics Diseases,1978, 37: 378- 381.
  • 5[5]WILKIE D,LOVEJOY N,DODD M,et al.Cancer pain intensity measurement:concurrent validity of three tools- finger dynameter,pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale[J].Hospice Journal,1990, 6:1- 13.
  • 6[6]MARCHAND S,BUSHNELL MC,DUNCAN GH.Modulation of heat pa- in perception by high frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,1991,1: 122- 129.
  • 7[7]PRICE DD,BUSH FM,LONG S,et al.A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scale[J].Pain,1994, 56: 217- 226.
  • 8[8]JESEN MP,MCFARLAND CA.Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients[J].Pain,1993,55:195- 203.
  • 9[9]RANSFORD AO, CAIRNS D,MOONEY V.The Pain drawing as an aid to the psychological evaluation of patients with low- back pain[J].Spine,1976,1(2):127- 134.
  • 10[10]MARGOLIS RB,CHIBNALL JT,TAIT RC.Test- retest reliability of the pain draw instrument[J].Pain,1988,33:49- 51.

共引文献1088

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部