期刊文献+

3.0TMRI上深筋膜完整性对于下肢软组织肿瘤良、恶性鉴别的价值 被引量:3

The diagnostic value of delineating deep fascia in distinguishing between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors in lower limbs using 3. 0 T MRI
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析3.0TMRI上深筋膜形态改变对于鉴别下肢软组织肿瘤良、恶性的价值。方法回顾分析40例患者共41个经病理证实的下肢软组织肿瘤的3.0TMRI表现。将肿瘤按主体与深筋膜的关系分为位于皮下浅层深筋膜外侧、深筋膜内侧、筋膜鞘间隙内、肌肉内的4组肿瘤,分析肿瘤与深筋膜的关系及深筋膜的形态学改变。将深筋膜外侧及内侧组肿瘤归为浅在肿瘤,筋膜鞘间隙及肌肉内肿瘤归为深部肿瘤,分别对其筋膜完整及筋膜破坏肿瘤的最大径进行Mann—WhitneyU检验。结果深筋膜外侧肿瘤7个,深筋膜内侧肿瘤8个,筋膜鞘间隙内肿瘤10个,肌肉内肿瘤16个。良性肿瘤16个,MRI显示深筋膜均完整,筋膜鞘间脂肪间隙存在;恶性肿瘤25个,其中23个见深筋膜破坏征象,包括筋膜中断处被肿瘤取代,肿瘤穿透筋膜生长;筋膜鞘间结构破坏,肌肉层次模糊,2例恶性肿瘤深筋膜完整。浅在肿瘤中,深筋膜完整者及破坏者肿瘤最大径的中位数±四分位数区间分别为(5.0±3.8)cm和(5.74±6.9)cm,两者差异无统计学意义(T=47.5,P〉0.05)。深部肿瘤中,深筋膜完整者及破坏者最大径的中位数4-四分位数区间分别为(4.64±1.9)cm和(13.64±6.5)cm,两者差异有统计学意义(T=62.5,P〈0.01)。以深筋膜破坏指征诊断恶性软组织肿瘤,敏感度为92.0%(23/25),特异度为100%(16/16),准确度为95.1%(39/41)。结论在3.0TMRI上显示深筋膜的破坏征象有助于恶性软组织肿瘤的诊断。 Objective To study the diagnostic value of the morphological changes to deep fascia in distinguishing between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors in lower limbs using 3.0 T MRI. Methods MR images of 40 consecutive patients with 41 pathologically proven soft-tissue tumors of the lower limbs were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists. Lesions were divided into four groups according to their predominant location with respect to the deep fascia : ( 1 ) Subcutaneous lesions superficial to the deep fascia ( n = 7 ). (2) Lesions located beneath the deep fascia ( n = 8 ). ( 3 ) Lesions in the interspaces of the deep fascia investment (n = 10). (4)Intramuscular lesions (n = 16 ). The relationship between tumors and the deep fascia and the morphology changes of deep fascia were analyzed. Lesions of groups ( 1 ) ( 2 ) were considered as superficial lesions, while lesions of group (3) (4) were considered as deeper lesions. The size differences between those had intact deep fascia and those had destructed deep fascia in superficial lesions and in deeper lesions were evaluated by using Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. P values 〈 0. 05 were considered statistically significant. Results The deep fascial structures were intact in all of the 16 pathologically proven benign lesions. In 23 of the 25 malignant lesions, there was destruction of the deep fascia with the signs of displacement/disruption of the deep fascia and penetrating growth in ( 1 ) ( 2 ), and displacement/distruption of intermuscular septum as well as involvement of interspaces of the deep fascial investment and loss of integrity of the faseial/museular planes in (3) (4). Only 2 malignant lesions demonstrate intact deep fascia. In superficial lesions [ ( 1 ) (2) ], the maximum size were ( 5.0 ± 3.8 ) cm (Median ± Interquartile Range ) in those had intact deep fascia, and (5.7 ± 6. 90 ) cm in those had destruction signs ( T = 47.5, P 〉 0. 05 ). In deeper lesions [ ( 3 ) ( 4 ) ] the maximum size were ( 4. 6 ± 1.9) cm of those had intact deep fascia, and ( 13.6 ± 6. 5 ) cm of those had destruction signs ( T = 62. 5, P 〈 0. 01 ). Distinguish malignant from benign lesions on the signs of destructed deep fascia, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 92. 0% (23/25), 100% ( 16/16 ), and 95.1% ( 39/41 ), respectively. Conclusions Tumor involvements and disruption of the deep fascial structures visualized by 3.0 T MR imaging may be of utility in differentiating malignant from benign soft-tissue tumors.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期160-164,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
关键词 软组织肿瘤 筋膜 磁共振成像 下肢 Soft tissue neoplasm Fascia Magnetic resonance imaging Lower extremity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Knapp EL, Kransdorf MJ, Letson GD. Diagnostic imaging update : soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Control, 2005, 12:22-26.
  • 2Burner NG, Bunnett-Britton T, Hoole AC, et al. The anatomy of sartorius muscle and its implications for sarcoma radiotherapy. Sarcoma, 2004, 8:7-12.
  • 3Belentani C, Pastore D, Wangwinyuvirat M, et al. Triceps brachii tendon: anatomic-MR imaging study in cadavers with histologic correlation. Skeletal Radial, 2009, 38 : 171-175.
  • 4Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Resnick D. MR imaging of abnormalities of the plantar fascia. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2002, 6:105-118.
  • 5Peduto AJ, Numkarunarunrote N, Trudell DJ, et al. Fibulotalocalcaneal ligament : magnetic resonance imaging findings with cadaver correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2009, 33: 444-448.
  • 6Peabody TD, Simon MA. Principles of staging of soft-tissue sarcomas. C lin Orthop Relat Res, 1993, 289 : 19-31.
  • 7Ledermann HP, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME. Is soft-tissue inflammation in pedal infection contained by fascial planes? MR analysis of compartmental involvement in 115 feet. AJR, 2002,178:605-612.
  • 8Fujimoto H, Ikeda M, Shimofusa R, et al. Sarcoidosis breaching the fascia and mimicking a sarcoma. Skeletal Radiol, 2002, 31: 706-708.
  • 9Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Radiologic evaluation of soft-tissue masses : a current perspective. AJR, 2000, 175:575-587.
  • 10Kalayanarooj S. Benign and malignant soft tissue mass: magnetic resonance imaging criteria for discrimination. J Med Assoc Thai, 2008,91:74-81.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Bhargava R, Parham DM, Lasater OE, et al. MR imaging differentiation of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: use of the target sign. Pediatr Radiol, 1997, 27: 124-129.
  • 2Suh JS, Abenoza P, Galloway HR, et al. Peripheral (extracranial)nerve tumors: correlation of MR imaging and histologic findings. Radiology, 1992, 183: 341-346.
  • 3Moulton JS, Blebea JS, Dunco DM, et al. MR imaging of soft-tissue masses: diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1995, 164:1191-1199.
  • 4Kransdorf M J, Murphey MD. Radiologic evaluation of soft-tissue masses: a current perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000, 175:575-587.
  • 5Siegel MJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal soft tissue masses. Radiol Clin North Am, 2001, 39: 701-720.
  • 6Pang KK, Hughes T. MR imaging of the musculoskeletal soft tissue mass: is heterogeneity a sign of malignancy? J Chin Med Assoc,2003, 66: 655-661.
  • 7Tsai TS, Evans HA, Donnelly LF, et al. Fat necrosis after trauma: a benign cause of palpable lumps in children. A JR Am J Roentgenol,1997, 169:1623-1626.

共引文献15

同被引文献26

  • 1刘宏伟,杨贞振,李传亭,吕玉波.常规MRI与^(31)P MR波谱在骨及软组织肿块中的鉴别诊断价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(2):198-203. 被引量:13
  • 2Rizzo J A,Dodge A, White P, et al. Magnetic resonance angiogra- phy in the evaluation of carotid stent patency[J]. Perspeet Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther,2010,22(4) :261--263.
  • 3Lira R P, Fan Z, Chatterji M, et al. Comparison of nonenhanced MR angiographic subtraction techniques for infragenual arteries at 1.5 T: a Preliminary study[J]. Radiology, 2013,267 (1) :293 -- 304.
  • 4Kunishima K, Mori H, Itoh D, et al. Assessment of arteriove- nous malformations with 3-Tesla time-resolved, contrast-en- hanced, three-dimensional, magnetic resonance angiography[J]. Neurosurg, 2009,110(3) :492--499.
  • 5Ramey N A, Lucarelli M J, Gentry L R, et al. Clinical usefulness of orbital and facial Time-Resolved Imaging of Contrast Kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography[J]. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg,2012,28(5) :361--368.
  • 6De Schepper AM, De Beuckeleer L, Vandevenne J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissue tumors [ J ]. Eur Radiol, 2000,10 : 213-223.
  • 7Moulton JS,Blebea JS, Munco DM. MR imaging of soft tissue mas- ses: diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions [ J 1. AJR, 1995,164 : 1191-1199.
  • 8Kransdorf M J, Murphey MD. Radiologic evaluation of soft-tissue mas- ses : a current perspective [ J ]. A JR ,2000,175:575-587.
  • 9Vander Woude H J, Verstraete KL, Hogendoorn PC, et al. Musculo- skeletal tumors: does fast dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging contribute to the characterization [ J ]. Radiology, 1998, 208:821-828.
  • 10Polland RE, Garcia TC, Stieger SM, et al. Quantitative evaluation of perfusion and permeability of peripheral tumors using contrast en- hanced computed tomography [ J ]. Invest Radiology, 2004,39 : 340- 344.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部