期刊文献+

双变量模型在诊断试验Meta分析中的应用 被引量:10

Application of Bivariate Analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity in Meta-Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的阐述灵敏度和特异度双变量Meta分析模型对于诊断试验的评价效果,为选择更好的诊断试验评价方法提供依据。方法通过最近发表的评价2种血吸虫免疫学诊断方法的Meta分析数据来阐述双变量随机效应模型分析方法。结果双变量模型可直接得出待比较的几种诊断方法的logit灵敏度、特异度及诊断优势比(DOR)均值及各自的95%CI,还可得出灵敏度均值、特异度均值以及DOR均值在2种诊断方法间有无统计学差异,同时还能合并估计不同研究间灵敏度和特异度可能存在的关联性。结论双变量模型保留了数据的二维特性,可以将灵敏度和特异度的效应分开估计,这比传统的SROC法得出诊断优势比的净效应更加合理。因此,双变量模型用于诊断试验评价是恰当的、灵活的,可作为经典SROC法的改进与补充。 Objective To illustrate the evaluation effect of bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity meta-analysis model in diagnosis test to provide basis for selecting better evaluation method of diagnostic test. Methods Bivariate model was presented by reanalyzing the data from a published meta analysis of two diagnostic techniques in diagnosis of schistosomiasis japonica. Results The bivariate model could directly provide summary estimates of(logit)sensitivity, specificity and DOR with corresponding 95% CI for two diagnostic tests(IHA and ELISA). Also,it could elicit any significant difference that existed a mong sensitivity, specificity and DOR between the two diagnostic methods, and incorporate any correlation that existed between sensitivity;specificity. Conclusion The bivariate model preserves the two dimensional nature of the original data,and separates effects of sensitivity and specificity, which is more rational than a net effect on diagnostic odds ratio scale as in SROC approach. The bivariate model is appropriate and agile,and can be used as an extension and improvement of the traditional SROC method.
出处 《华中科技大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期78-81,共4页 Acta Medicinae Universitatis Scientiae et Technologiae Huazhong
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.30371254)
关键词 诊断准确度 敏感性与特异性 META分析 随机效应模型 diagnostic accuracy sensitivity and specificity Meta analysis random effect model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Sackett D L, Haynes R B. The architecture of diagnostic research[M]//Knottneru J A. The evidence base of clinical diagnosis. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2002 : 19-38.
  • 2Knottnerus J A,Muris J W. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2003,6(11) :1118-1128.
  • 3祝慧萍,夏欣,钟文明,董国营,宇传华.日本血吸虫病血清学诊断试验的Meta分析[J].中国卫生统计,2009,26(1):45-48. 被引量:3
  • 4Van Houwelingen H C,Arends L R,Stijnen T. Advanced me thods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression[J]. Stat Med,2002,21(4) :589-624.
  • 5Johannes B R, Afina S. G, Anne W S, et al. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity an d specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005,58 (10) :982- 990.
  • 6Haitao C,Stephen R. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data:a generalized linear mixed model approach[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2006,59 (12):1331-1333.
  • 7Walter S D,Jadad A R. Meta-analysis of screening data:a survey of the literature[J]. Stat Med, 1999,18(24) :3409-3424.
  • 8Rutter C M,Gatsonis C A. A hierarchical regression approach to metaanalysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations [J]. Stat Med,2001,20(19) :2865-2884.
  • 9Deeks J J. Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests [J]. BMJ,2001,323(7305) :157 -162.
  • 10Mose L E, Shapiro D, Littenberg B, et al. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve:data-analytic approaches and some addition considerations[J]. Statist Med, 1993,12(14) : 1293-1316.

二级参考文献13

共引文献2

同被引文献133

  • 1曾宪涛,李胜,雷晋,郭毅.Review Manager 5软件在诊断准确性试验的Meta分析中的应用[J].湖北医药学院学报,2013,32(1):6-16. 被引量:33
  • 2石杲,王树君,张杰.布鲁氏菌病抗体快速检测新方法—胶体金技术的应用研究[J].医学动物防制,2006,22(1):9-10. 被引量:22
  • 3马春花,王宝珠.急诊分诊过程管理应用研究[J].护理研究(中旬版),2006,20(12):3197-3199. 被引量:20
  • 4孙红,绳宇,周文华.急诊分诊标准的制定与实施[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2007,22(7):58-60. 被引量:60
  • 5Pai M, Flores LL, Hubbard A, et al. Nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis: A systematic review and recta-analysis[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2004,4:6.
  • 6Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. Ahierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations [J ]. Star Med, 2001,20(19) :2865-2884.
  • 7Harbord RM, Whiting P. Metandi: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression [J]. The Stata J, 2009,9(2) :211-229.
  • 8Macaskill P. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2004,57(9): 925 -932.
  • 9Chu H, Cole SR. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: A generalized linear mixed model approach[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2006,59(12):1331-1332.
  • 10Landes CA, Goral WA, Sader R, et al. 3-D sonography for diagnosis of disc dislocation of the temporomandibular joint compared with MRI[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol,2006,32(5):633-639.

引证文献10

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部