期刊文献+

Sino-US Relations: Dependence and Fragility

Sino-US Relations: Dependence and Fragility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The twenty years after the end of the Cold War have witnessed a transformation of the mode of Sino-US relations from Security Issue-dominated to Complex Interdependence.Today,conflicts of interest between China and the US can be classified and resolved through normal channels,which protects the roots of good Sino-US relations instead of constantly placing them under threat.However,shifts in the relative power of the two countries,and shifting preferences in their interests continue to highlight the fragility of Sino-US relations.China needs to manage this fragile relationship carefully if it is to achieve its aim of a peaceful rise. The twenty years after the end of the Cold War have witnessed a transformation of the mode of Sino-US relations from Security Issue-dominated to Complex Interdependence. Today, conflicts of interest between China and the US can be classified and resolved through normal channels, which protects the roots of good Sino-US relations instead of constantly placing them under threat. However, shifts in the relative power of the two countries, and shifting preferences in their interests continue to highlight the fragility of Sino-US relations. China needs to manage this fragile relationship carefully if it is to achieve its aim of a peaceful rise.
作者 Niu Xinchun
出处 《Contemporary International Relations》 2010年第1期74-95,共22页 现代国际关系(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Thomas C. Shelling, The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960, p.5.
  • 2Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Little, Brown and Company, 1977, p.9.
  • 3Jim Hoagland, "The Lukewarm War With China", The Washington Post, April 16, 2006, p. B07.
  • 4Office of the Secretary of Defense, "Military Power of the People's Republic of China 2009", Annual Report to the Congress.
  • 5[美]江忆恩.《中国参与国际体制的若干思考》[J].世界经济与政治,1999,.
  • 6Robert Powell, "Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory", in David A. Baldwin (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: the Contemporary Debate, Columbia University Press, 1993, p.211.
  • 7Joseph J. Schatz, "Dtlet Withthe Dragon", CQ Weekly, June 15, 2009, p. 1366.
  • 8李静,吴庆才.“首轮中美经济战略对话:除上月球主要问题均己谈及”,http://www.chinanews.com.cn/gn/news/2009/07—29/1794984.shtml.
  • 9Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence: Worm Politics in Transition, Little, Brown and Company, 1977, p.8.
  • 10Arthur A. Stein, "Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World", International Organization, spring 1982, pp.319-320.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部