摘要
目的评价中医药治疗癌痛临床试验文献的质量。方法计算机检索中医药治疗癌痛的临床试验文献,并参考《中医药临床随机对照试验报告规范》的要求,对文献质量进行描述性分析。结果纳入94篇随机对照试验文献,存在一些必要信息表述不足如诊断、纳入及排除标准不清晰,随机方法及盲法应用的缺失,统计方法描述不详细以及不良反应和随访重视不足等问题。结论中医药治疗癌痛临床试验文献质量还不够高,需要进一步改进和提高。
Object Appraising the quality of clinical trials literature about the Chinese medicine treating the cancer pain. Method Searching the clinical trial papers of traditional Chinese medicine trea- ting the cancer pain, and refering to CONSORT for TCM to collect the information of these papers to analy- sis the quality. Result A total of 94 randomized controlled trial papers, some of these statements lack the necessary information such as diagnosis Criteria, inclution criteria and exclusion criteria, the lack of ran- dom selection and blind application, the statistical method description not in detail as well as lack of ad- verse reactions and follow-up attention and so on. Conclusion The quality of clinical trials papers about the Chinese medicine treating the cancer pain is not good enough, and needing further enhancement and improvement.
出处
《环球中医药》
CAS
2010年第2期125-127,共3页
Global Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
"十一五"国家科技支撑计划(2008BAI53B021)
关键词
癌痛
中医药
随机对照试验
Cancer pain
Traditional Chinese medicine
Randomized controlled trial