期刊文献+

财政再分配失灵与财政制度安排——基于不同分配环节的实证分析 被引量:17

Fiscal Redistribution Failure and Fiscal System Arrangement:Empirical Study Based on Different Distribution Links
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行财政性制度安排作用于要素配置、初次分配两个环节,是财政再分配失灵的制度根源。文章计量分析表明:(1)初次分配及要素资源配置环节存在的制度性扭曲是收入差距扩大和财政再分配失灵的根源;(2)再分配性财政政策调节力度有限,未来财政调节收入差距应着力消除初次分配及要素资源配置环节的制度性扭曲;(3)教育、医疗卫生等公共服务支出能改善居民人力资本积累和要素结构、缩小收入差距,但其前提是基本公共服务的均等化,这也是财政制度改进的方向。 The current fiscal system arrangement in China affecting factor allocation and primary distribution is the institutional source of fiscal redistribution failure. The analysis shows as follows: firstly, the widening income disparity and fiscal re-distribution failure stem from the institutional distortion in the links of primary distribution and factor allocation; secondly, the function of fiscal policies on re-distribution is very limited, and fu- ture efforts should be made to eliminate the institutional distortion in the links of primary distribution and factor allocation; thirdly, the expenditure on public services such as basic education and public health can improve the structure of human capital accumulation and factors and shorten the income disparity. However, such effects can only be obtained under the equalization of basic public services, which is a direction of the improvement of fiscal systems.
作者 蔡跃洲
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期77-89,共13页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 中国博士后科学基金项目(20070410113)
关键词 财政制度 再分配失灵 收入差距 fiscal system re-distribution failure income disparity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1陈昌盛,蔡跃洲.中国政府公共服务报告:体制变迁与综合评估[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007.
  • 2高培勇.规范政府行为:解决中国当前收入分配问题的关键[J].财贸经济,2002,23(1):5-10. 被引量:54
  • 3赵人伟,李实.中国居民收入差距的扩大及其原因[C].赵人伟,李实,卡尔·李思勤.中国居民收入分配再研究[A].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1999.
  • 4Bellettini Giorgio, Carlotta B Ceroni. Income distribution, borrowing constraints and redistributive Policies[J]. European Economic Review, 2007,51, 625-645.
  • 5Bertola Giuseppe. Factor share and savings in endogenous growth[R]. NBER Working Paper, 1991,3851.
  • 6Li H, H-F Zou. Income inequality is not harmful for growth: Theory and evidence[J]. Review of Development Economics, 1993, (2) : 318--334.
  • 7Perotti Roberto. Political equilibrium, income distribution, and growth[J].The Review of Economic Studies, 1993,60(4) : 755-- 776.
  • 8Persson Torsten, Tabellini Guido. Is inequality harmful for growth? Theory and evidence[R]. NBER Working Paper, 1991,3599.

二级参考文献2

共引文献53

同被引文献227

引证文献17

二级引证文献236

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部