技术能力对新产品开发绩效的影响:以技术管理为调节变量被引量：13

The impact of technological capability on new product development performance:the moderating role of technology management

原文传递

导出

摘要新产品开发作为企业经营过程中的重要环节,是企业获取竞争优势的重要源泉。从理论上分析了技术能力对新产品开发绩效的影响,以及技术管理的对技术能力与新产品开发绩效关系的调节作用。利用对151家企业调查的数据进行实证分析,研究结果发现,技术能力各要素均对新产品开发绩效有显著的正向影响作用,其中人员能力影响最大,其次是组织能力,再次是信息能力,设备能力影响较小。研究结果同时发现技术管理对人员能力、设备能力、信息能力、组织能力与新产品开发绩效的关系均具有正向调节作用。 As an important part of the enterprise business processes, new product development is a significant resource to obtain competitive advantage. This paper, firstly, analyzes the impact of technological capability on new product development performance, as well as the moderating role of technology management capability in the relationship between technological capability and new product development performance. And then, an empirical study is made based on the survey of 151 enterprises. The results show that technological capability has a significantly positive impact on new product development performance; and human resource capability has the greatest impact and organization capability and information capability has less impact, and equipment capability has the least. At the same time, the results also indicate that technology management capability has positive moderating impacts on the relationships between human resource capability, equipment capability, organization capability and information capability and new product development performance.

作者吴伟伟邓强于渤

机构地区哈尔滨工业大学管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期429-435,共7页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972089) 黑龙江省青年科学基金项目(QC2009C109) 哈尔滨工业大学科研创新基金资助(HIT.NSRIF:2009110)

关键词技术能力技术管理新产品开发绩效 technological capability technology management new product development performance

分类号 F273 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献30

1Dore R. Technological self reliance [ A ]. Fransman M, King K. Technological Capacity In The Third World [ C]. London: Macmilan. 1984.65 -68.
2Desai Ashok. India's technological capability: an analysis of its achievements and limits[ J ]. Research Policy, 1984,13(5) : 303 -310.
3Stewart F. Facilitating indigenous technical change in the third world[ A]. Fransman M, King K. Technological Capability in the Third World[ R]. London: Macmilan. 1984. 156 - 168.
4Hakan Hakansson, Alexandra Waluszewski. Managing Technological Development[ M ]. UK : Routledge, 2002.
5魏江,许庆瑞.企业技术能力的概念、结构和评价[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1995,16(9):29-33. 被引量：44
6Suarez F, Lanzolla G. The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007,32, (2) : 377 - 392.
7Teppo Felin, William S. Hesterly The knowledge - based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation : philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge[ J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007,32 (1): 195-218.
8Zahra S A, George G. Absorptive capacity: a review,reconceptualization, and extension [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2002,27 ( 2 ) : 185 - 203.
9江旭,高山行,廖貅武.外部知识获取、新产品开发与企业绩效关系的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2008,20(5):72-77. 被引量：25
10Metre Praest Knudsen. The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success [ J ]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2007,24(2) : 117 - 138.

二级参考文献94

1宝贡敏,杨静.企业技术管理在技术创新中的角色——基于浙江省企业的研究[J].科学学研究,2004,22(5):546-551. 被引量：28
2温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量：3031
3魏江.企业技术能力：增长过程、机理与模式.浙江大学博士论文[M].-,1997..
4潘惠.企业技术能力积累的机制、途径与动态模型.浙江大学硕士论文[M].,1999..
5Grant R M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996,17: 109-122.
6Baum J A C, Ingrain P L. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry,1898-1980 [J]. Management Science, 1998,44:996-1016.
7Davenport T H. Knowledge management and the broader firm: Strategy, advantage, and performance [A]. In Liebowitz J (ed). Knowledge management handbook [ M]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press,1999.
8Lee H, Choi B. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination [ J ]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003,20 ( 1 ) : 179-228.
9Ahn J, Chang S. Assessing the contribution of knowledge to business performance : The KP3 methodology. [J]. Decision Support Systems ,2004,36:403-416.
10Holsapple C W, Singh M. The knowledge chain model: Activities for competitiveness [ J]. Expert Systems with Applications ,2001,20( 1 ) :77-98.