期刊文献+

二语写作准确性因子分析 被引量:1

Accuracy in Second Language Writing:A Factor Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对二语写作的准确性在多大程度上可被测量,哪几种变量组合解释的方差最大,何种可测变量能直接影响作文成绩几个问题进行研究。使用的语料来自随机抽取的南京大学英语专业四个年级320名学生的240篇限时作文。对二语写作准确性可测变量进行因子分析结果表明:二语写作的准确性是可测的,同时获得了由12个变量组成的三个因子,这些因子累计解释的方差达到了71.359%。 This paper attempts to address the following research questions: is it possible to measure accuracy in second language writing; if possible, which variable combination can best explain the total variance? And what variables can directly affect second language writing scores? The corpus used for the study was 240 compositions randomly selected from timed compositions written by 320 students across four grades. The results of factor analysis show that accuracy in second language writing is measurable, and three factors composed of 12 variables are obtained, which can account for 71.359% of the total variance.
出处 《黄山学院学报》 2010年第1期122-126,共5页 Journal of Huangshan University
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目"中国大学生英语写作能力发展规律与特点"(OIJA740030)
关键词 二语写作 准确性测量 因子分析 second language writing accuracy measurement factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

同被引文献13

  • 1Christie, F. 2012. Language Education throughout the School Years: A Functional Perspective [M]. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • 2Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based Language Darning and Teaching [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 3Ellis, R. & Yuan, F. 2003. The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1): 59-84.
  • 4Hirano, K. 1991. The effect of audience on the efficacy of objective measures of EFL proficiency in Japanese university students [J]. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, (2): 21-30.
  • 5Hunt, K. W. 1965. Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Leuels [M]. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
  • 6Kowal, I. 2014. Fluency in second language writing: A developmental perspective [J]. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 131(3): 229-246.
  • 7Ortega, L. 2003. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing [J]. Applied Linguistics, 24(4): 492-518.
  • 8Skehan, P. 1996. A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction [J]. Applied Linguistics, 17(1): 38-62.
  • 9Skehan, P. & Foster, P. 1999. The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings [J]. Language Learning, 49(1): 93-120.
  • 10Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H. Y. 1998. Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity [M]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部