期刊文献+

三种准分子激光角膜切削术后中央角膜厚度变化的对比研究 被引量:5

Comparison of Corneal Thickness after Three Kinds of Excimer Laser Refractive Procedures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较三种准分子激光角膜切削术后中央角膜厚度(CCT)的差异并探讨不同手术方式角膜切削量的设定。方法使用Pentacam三维眼前段分析仪测量行SBK、LASIK、Epi-LASIK术的近视患者共136例266只眼术前术后的CCT,按屈光度分为低、中、高三组,分别计算和比较CCT及实际切削深度和设计切削深度的差值(Diff值)。结果Epi-LASIK患者低、中、高度组术前CCT分别为(495.70±24.94)、(501.57±31.34)和(525.18±16.53)μm,较SBK和LASIK组患者CCT明显偏薄(P<0.01),SBK与LASIK患者术前术后的CCT无显著性差异。SBK、LASIK术后Diff值比较:低度组Diff值分别为(6.57±12.72)、(5.33±9.51)μm;中度组Diff值分别为(7.07±18.19)、(4.42±8.72)μm;高度组分别为Diff值(11.52±10.29)、(7.00±7.33)μm,各组比较差异均无显著性意义。三种手术方式的实际切削的角膜深度均大于设计量。结论CCT较薄的患者多选择Epi-LASIK。充分估计术中实际切削深度与设计切削深度存在的差异是提高手术安全性的保障。 Objective To investigate the changes in central corneal thickness (CCT) before and after different excimer laser refractive procedures and the settings of ablation depth before them.Methods Pre-and post-operation CCT in 266 eyes of 136 myopic patients who proceeded SBK,LASIK and Epi-LASIK was measured by Pentacam.All cases were divided into low,moderate and high groups according the diopter of myopia to compare the changes in CCT and difference of measured and estimated ablation depth.ResultsThe pre-operation CCT of low,moderate and high groups with Epi-LASIK was (495.70±24.94)μm,(501.57±31.34)μm,and (525.18±16.53)μm,respectively,thinner than the other two groups significantly(P0.01).After SBK and LASIK,Diff value was ( 6.57±12.72)μm and (5.33±9.51) μm in low myopia ones,(7.07±18.19) μm and (4.42±8.72) μm in moderate myopia ones and (11.52±10.29) μm and (7.00±7.33) μm in high myopia ones,there was no significant difference.The measured ablation depth all exceeded the estimated one in three kinds of operations.ConclusionsPeople who have thinner CCT always choose Epi-LASIK.Consideriing the discrepancy of measured ablation depth and estimated one sufficiently is the guarantee of operation safety.
出处 《中国激光医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2010年第1期6-9,共4页 Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine & Surgery
关键词 近视 激光 角膜切削术 角膜厚度 Myopia Laser Keratectomy Corneal thickness
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE,et al. Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-Bowman's keratomileusis[ J] ? J Refract Surg,2008 ,24 :90-96.
  • 2Katsanevaki VJ, Kalyvianaki MI, Kavroulaki DS, et al. Epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis: an evolving surface ablation procedure for refractive corrections [ J ]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2006,17:389-393.
  • 3Pallikaris IG, Katsanevaki V J, Kalyvianaki MI, et al. Advances in subepithelial excimer refractive surgery techniques : Epi-LASIK[ J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2003,14 : 207 -212.
  • 4Ciolino JB, Khachician SS, Belin MW, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and scheimpflug photography in eyes that have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2008,145 : 75- 80. e2.
  • 5OI)onnell C, Maldonado-Codina C. Agreement and repeatability of central thickness measurement in normal corneas using ultrasound pachymetry and the OCULUS Pentacam [ J]. Cornea, 2005,24:920-924.
  • 6Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound [ J ]. Optom Vis Sci, 2005, 82:892-899.
  • 7黄锦海,温岱宗,陈世豪,王勤美.Pentacam系统测量LASIK术后眼前节参数重复性的研究[J].眼科研究,2009,27(1):70-71. 被引量:8
  • 8Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B. Posterior corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to residual corneal bed thickness [ J ]. Ophthalmology, 1999,106:406-410.
  • 9Liu Z, Huang A J, Pflugfelder SC. Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbsean corneal topography system[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1999, 83:774-778.
  • 10李琳,谢连满,杨斌,邓瑛.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜厚度变化分析[J].中华眼科杂志,2004,40(1):17-19. 被引量:30

二级参考文献8

  • 1郭玉峰,赵少贞.Pentacam角膜厚度测量功能在CK治疗中的应用[J].天津医药,2007,35(2):129-130. 被引量:1
  • 2Giessler S,Duncker GI. Orbscan pachymetry after LASIK is not reliable [ J]. J Refract Surg,2001,17 (3):385 -387
  • 3Iskander NG, Anderson Penno E, Peters NT, et al. Accuracy of Orbscan pachymetry measurements and DGH ultrasound pachymetry in primary laser in situ keratomileusis and LASIK enhancement procedures [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2001,27: 681 -685
  • 4Buehl W, Stojanac D, Sacu S, et al. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth [ J ]. Am J Ophthalmo1,2006,141 ( 1 ) : 7 - 12
  • 5Jain R, Dilraj G, Grewal SP. Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis [ J ]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2007,55(5) : 341 -347
  • 6Ciolino JB, Khachikian SS, Belin MW. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and scheimpflug photography in eyes that have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis[ J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2008, 145(1):75 -80
  • 7廉井财,周德佑,叶纹,王康孙.准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术治疗近视[J].中华眼科杂志,1998,34(4):287-290. 被引量:73
  • 8王铮,杨斌,陈家祺,刘华.LASIK后角膜后表面曲率变化[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2000,18(4):238-239. 被引量:57

共引文献36

同被引文献45

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部