期刊文献+

公民责任意识:结构与动力分析及其教育的行动策略 被引量:5

Civic Responsibility:The Structural and Dynamic Analysis And Its Action Strategy in Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对当前公民责任意识教育存在的困难,文章从心理学角度出发,指出了当前研究所忽略的整体情境的动力和阻力问题,并尝试根据勒温的场论思想,对中国公民责任意识教育进行了整体和动力分析。通过整体结构的分析,提出了构成公民责任意识情境的三个维度:文化特征(差序格局-团体格局)、关系内容(传统社会的"义"、"利"、"情"和现代社会的"公")和现实程度(现实-虚构)维度。据此以拓扑心理学形式,举例说明了情境与人格交互作用中的动力和阻力因素。在上述个体层面分析的基础上,文章还简述了公民责任意识教育实践的团体动力学原理,并以展望未来论坛为例,介绍了正在兴起的公民责任意识教育的行动策略。 As there is great difficulty in civic responsibility education, this paper pointed out and analyzed the neglected holistic and dynamic issues in civic responsibility education with the view of Lewin's field theory. By holistic analysis ,we proposed a three - dimensional situation of civic responsibility, i. e. , the cultural property (the diversity - orderly pattern vs. group pattern), the content of relationship (Yi, Li, Qing in traditional culture and Civic in modern culture) and the reality degree (reality vs. irreality). We also exemplified the driving and resistant force in the interaction between personality and situation in the form of topological psychology. Based on these individual analysis, we introduced the group dynamical education of civic responsibility with the example of Future Search Conference.
作者 李明
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2010年第1期15-20,共6页 Psychological Exploration
基金 国家社会科学基金"十一五"规划教育学2007重点课题(BEA070007)
关键词 公民 责任意识 结构 动力 行动 Civic responsibility structure dynamic action
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1石国亮.公民意识教育的新起点.中青政校报电子版.2008,(4).(http://cyu.cuepa.cn/show_more.php?tkey=&bkey=&doc_id=110102).
  • 2牛国卫.成就责任公民:社群主义向度的公民教育[J].思想理论教育,2008(23):29-33. 被引量:10
  • 3Winter D G, Barenbaum N B. Responsibility and the power motive in women and men, Journal of Personality, 1985,53: 335 - 355.
  • 4Winter D G. Scoring scoring system for responsibility. Unpublished Manual for Responsibility, 1998.1 -2.
  • 5McCrae R R, Costa P T. A Five - Factor Theory of personality. In : L A Pervin, O P John. Eds. Handbook of Personality Psychology. New York: Guilford, 1999. 139 - 153.
  • 6Roberts B W, Cheruyshenko O S, Stark S, et al.. The structure of co - nscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on Seven Major Personality Questionnaires. Personnel Psychology,2005,58 ( 1 ) : 103 - 139.
  • 7Wood J A, Winston B E. Toward a new understanding of leader accountability defining a critical construct. Journal of Leadership &Organizational Studies,2005,11 (3) : 84 - 95.
  • 8王一星.“差序格局”给公务员带来的责任困境分析[J].陕西行政学院学报,2008,22(1):17-19. 被引量:5
  • 9Lewin K. Field theory in social science:Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin. London :Tavistock. 1952. 169.
  • 10Kurt Lewin. Field Theory in Social Science. Harper & Brother Publishers, New York : 1951.25.

二级参考文献78

共引文献96

同被引文献34

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部