期刊文献+

从撒旦的角度看《失乐园》中上帝形象的塑造 被引量:2

The Image of God in Paradise Lost from the Perspective of Satan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从叙述学的角度出发,撒旦的"人物视角"可以用来分析和考察《失乐园》中上帝的形象。对上帝的"能",撒旦经历了一个从藐视到抵触到最终承认的过程;而对于上帝的"善",撒旦对圣父的善痛快承认,但他拒绝承认和接受圣子之善。撒旦所感知的上帝形象与史诗中旁观叙述者所感知的上帝形象大为不同,这种不同正是《失乐园》中叙述艺术精妙之所在。 In the light of narratology, this paper attempts to analyze the image of God in Paradise Lost from the figural perspective of Satan. Satan's perception of the omnipotent God varies from disdainful attitude in the beginning to acknowledgment in the end, whereas he expresses a convinced attitude towards the "all-good" of God. In fact, Satan never changes his antipathy towards the Son of God. By combining the narrator's perception of the image of God with the figural point of view, this paper tends to present a new understanding of the image of God in Paradise Lost.
作者 冯莉
出处 《四川教育学院学报》 2009年第12期59-62,共4页 Journal of Sichuan College of Education
关键词 《失乐园》 上帝形象 撒旦 叙述视角 内视角 外视角 叙述技巧 Paradise Lost the image of God Satan narrative perspective inner point of view outer point of view narrative techniques
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Long, William J. English Literature [M]. Charleston, SC: BiblioBazaar, 2007.. 216.
  • 2王晓秦.《失乐园》创作思想试析[J].外国文学研究,1983,5(2):80-87. 被引量:5
  • 3申丹.视角[J].外国文学,2004(3):52-61. 被引量:125
  • 4朱维之.失乐园[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1984.
  • 5Milton, John. Paradise Lost[M]. Gordon Teskey. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005.
  • 6Waldock, A. J. A. Satan and the Technique of Degradation[M]//Gordon Teskey. Paradise Lost. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005 : 415.
  • 7朱维之,译.弥尔顿诗选[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1998:1.
  • 8Gordon Teskey, ed. , Paradise Lost (3rd revised edition, New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005).
  • 9朱维之先生译本《失乐园》,上海译文出版社,1984.

二级参考文献52

  • 1Dan Shen, “Breaking Conventional Barriers: Transgressions of Modes of Focalization,” in Willie van Peer and Seymour Chatman (2001), 159-172.
  • 2Dan Shen, “Defense and Challenge: Reflections on theRelation between Story and Discourse,”Narrative, 10(2002) : 422-443.
  • 3Dan Shen, “Difference Behind Similarity: Focalization in First-Person Narration and Third-Person Grater of Consciousness“ in Acts of Narrative, edited by Carol Jaeohs and Henry Nksmlan, 81-92 (Stanford: Stanford UP, 2003).
  • 4Paul Simpson, Language, Ideology and Point of View(London: Routledge, 1993).
  • 5F. K. Stanzel, A Theory of Narrative (Cambridge:Cambridge UP, 1984).
  • 6Boris Uspensky, A Poetics of Composition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973).
  • 7Willie van Peer and Seymour Chatman, eds., New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001 ).
  • 8Robyn Warhol, “The Look, the Ptxty, and the Heroine of Persuasion, ”in Ambiguous Discourse: Feminist Narratology and British Women Writers, edited by Kathy Mezei (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press,1996), 21-39.
  • 9William Nelles, “Getting Fcw..alization into Focus,” Poetics Today, 11 : 2 (1990):365-382.
  • 10Patrick O'Neill, Fictions of Discourse : Reading Narrative Theory (Toronto: University of Toronto Press,1994).

共引文献130

同被引文献8

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部