期刊文献+

#sC音丛的音节结构:空韵核、偶分韵基与首音 被引量:1

The Syllabic Structure of #sC Clusters:empty Nucleus,Rhymal-complement and Onset
原文传递
导出
摘要 #sC音丛的音节结构颇受争议,集中体现在此音丛构成单音节还是多音节,/s/与其后辅音构成首音还是音节的附加成分、亦或更为极端的说法:此结构位于两个音节,/s/位于韵基的尾音位置,其前是一个空韵核,其后辅音被置于另一音节的首音。本篇通过此结构的管辖音系学(简称GP)理论分析及多语言实证数据,证明GP音系学关于s+C音丛的音节结构尤其是位于词首即#sC音丛的结构表征合格性。本篇的另一目的旨在提高对此结构复杂性和标记性的认识,推动音系习得及临床语言障碍干预治疗研究的发展。 The syllabic structure of #sC clusters is contentious, diverging on whether it is heterosyUabic or tautosyllabic, whether /s/ constitutes part of an onset or the adjunct of the syllabic, or even radically, the branching rhymal complement preceded by an adjacent empty nucleus. This essay aims to explore the well- formed syllabification of s + C consonant clusters, in particular, #sC clusters in line with Government Phonology (GP). By delineation of phonological phenomena in different languages, supplemented with empirical evidence and theoretical analysis on # sC clusters,the author of this paper argues that the syllabic representation of s + C is well-formed in support of Government Phonology. It is syllabified heterosyllabically as an'empty nucleus with the rbymal complement (traditional coda) followed by another onset. This paper also throws some light on the awareness of the complexity and markedness of this cluster for the purpose of promoting phonological acquisition and clinical intervention studies.
作者 李越
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期36-41,共6页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 管辖音系学 #sC音丛 空韵核 偶分韵基“尾音” Government Phonology #sC cluster empty nucleus branching rhymal-complement ( "coda" )
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Barlow,J. A. Individual Differences in the Production of Initial Consonant Sequences in Pig Latin [ J ]. Lingua,2001 a ( 111 ).
  • 2Barlow,J. A. The Strucrtue of/s/-sequences:Evidence from a Disordered System [ J ]. Journal of Child Language,2001 b (28).
  • 3Barlow,J. A. Constraint Conflict in Cluster Reduction[ J]. Journal of Child Language,2003 a ( 30 ).
  • 4Barlow,J. A. Asymmetries in the Acquisition of Consonant Clusters in Spanish [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Linguistics,2003 b,48 ( 3/4 ).
  • 5Barlow, J. A. Phonological Change and the Representation of Consonant Clusters in Spanish: a Case Study [ J ]. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics,2005,19 ( 8 ).
  • 6Boyd J. K. Results From a GL Modal of Onset Acquisition : Do English /s/-clusters Differ Structurally from Other Consonant Sequences[ J]. SWOT , Unpublished Handout ,2002.
  • 7Cardoso,W. The Development of sC Onset Clusters in lnterlanguage: Markedness vs. Frequency Effects[ C ]. In Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference ( GASLA 2007). Roumyana Slabakova et al. ( ed. ) Somervill, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project,2008.
  • 8Chomsky, N & M. Halle, The Sound Pattern of English [ M ]. New York : Harper & Row, 1968.
  • 9Davis, S. Italian Onset Structure and the Distribution of il and lo [ J]. Linguistics, 1990 ( 28 ).
  • 10Gierut, J. A. Syllable Onsets:Clusters and Adjuncts in Acquisition [ J ]. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1999 ( 42 ).

二级参考文献31

  • 1左岩.优选论的最新进展之一──共感理论[J].现代外语,1999,22(3):310-326. 被引量:19
  • 2李兵.当代音系学的方法论特征[J].现代外语,2001,24(1):1-22. 被引量:13
  • 3马秋武.后SPE音系学理论的发展取向[J].外国语,2001,24(3):15-22. 被引量:20
  • 4Kager, Rene. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5McCarthy, John. 1999[1998]. Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16,3:331-99.
  • 6McCarthy, John. 2002. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Smolensky, Paul. 1995. On the internal structure of the constraint component Con of UG. ROA-86.
  • 8马秋武.北京话儿化的优选论分析[J].现代外语,2003,(2):143-143.
  • 9马秋武.“天津话连读变调之谜”的优选论解释[Z].,..
  • 10Binarity theorem. All syllabic constituents are maximally binary ( Kaye, Lowenstamm and Vergnaud, 1990 : 199).

共引文献2

同被引文献32

  • 1李兵.优选论的产生、基本原理与应用[J].现代外语,1998,21(3):74-93. 被引量:70
  • 2王嘉龄.优选论与功能主义[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(1):30-34. 被引量:32
  • 3Monaka,Kemmonye Collete. The Binary Branching Nature of Syllable Constituents: the English Onset[J]. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 2007,25 (4):505-518.
  • 4Hooper J. Constraints on Schwa-deletion in English[A].Fisiak J.Recent Developments in Historical Phonology[C].isia Berlin: De Gruyter, 1978.183-207.
  • 5Kahn D.Syllable-based Generalizations in English Phonology [M].Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976.
  • 6Rudes B. Another Look at Syllable Structure[M].Indiana Uni versity Linguistics Club, 1977.
  • 7Bailey C.Gradience in English Syllabication and a Revised Concept of Unmarked Syllabication[M].Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1978.
  • 8Fallows D.Experimental Evidence for English Syllabification and Syllable Structure[J].Joumal of Linguistics, 1981,17 (2): 309-317.
  • 9Vermemaun T.Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change[M].Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1988.
  • 10Selkirk E O. The syllable[A]. H. Van der Hulst,N Smith. The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part II) [C]. Dordrecht:Foris, 1982.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部