期刊文献+

老年人夫妻依恋问卷的编制 被引量:12

The Development of the Questionnaire of Marital Attachment for Older Adults
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为编制适用于老年人的夫妻依恋测量问卷,将18份常用的成人依恋问卷的题目作为最初的项目来源,经过预试初步筛选得到85个项目。对434名60~88岁的社区老年人进行施测,并对施测结果进行项目分析和探索性因素分析,初步形成《老年人夫妻依恋问卷》。该问卷包含18个项目,分属于安全、焦虑和拒绝三个维度。该问卷具有良好的信度和效度,可用于测量城市社区老年人的夫妻依恋状况。运用《老年人夫妻依恋问卷》对样本的依恋模式进行考察,发现老年人夫妻依恋模式的分布特点表现为:安全型依恋模式的人数比例最高,其次是焦虑型依恋,最少是拒绝型依恋。 To develop a questionnaire measuring the marital attachment style for older people, items from 18 existent and widely used questionnaires were collected together as the item source. After the initial screening by pilot study, 85 items were identified as the primary items of the questionnaire. And then 434 older people aged from 60 to 88 years old completed this 85-item measurement. Among the participants, 222 were male and 212 were female. With item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, 18 items were identified as good representative of the questionnaire. Factory analysis indicated that the final 18 - item scale comprised three sub - scales, namely security, anxiety and avoidance. The reliability and validity were examined respectively and showed that the questionnaire had satisfactory psychometric features. The distribution of attachment style among older adults was explored tentatively with the sample. With discriminative analysis, all the participants could be categorized into three types of attachment styles, i.e. secure attachment with the highest ratio, anxious attachment and refusal attachment with the lowest ratio.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期197-204,共8页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 教育部一般人文社科基金(青年)(08JCXLX002) 国家自然科学基金(青年)(30500160)
关键词 老年 夫妻依恋 依恋风格 older adults marital attachment attachment style
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Antonucci, T. C. , Akiyama, H. , & Takahashi, K. ( 2004 ). Attachment and close relationships across the life span. Attachment and Human Development, 6(4), 353- 370.
  • 2Baldwin, M. W., Patrick, J., Keelan, R., et al. (1996). Socialcognition conceptualization of attachment working models: availability and accessibility effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 94-109.
  • 3Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (2), 226 -244.
  • 4Bartholomew, K., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Methods of assessing adult attachment, in J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford Press. 25 -45.
  • 5Becker, T. E, & Billings, R. S. (1997). Validity of scores on three attachment style scales: Exploratory and confirmatory evidence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57( 3 ), 477 -493.
  • 6Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  • 7Bowlby, J. (1958). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. New York: Basic Books.
  • 8Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In Simpson J A, Rholes W S ( Eds. ) , Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford Press. 46 - 76.
  • 9Brennan, K. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1995). Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (3) , 267 - 284.
  • 10Carver, C. S. (1997). Adult attachment and personality: Converging evidence and a new measure, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23 ( 8 ) , 865 - 884.

二级参考文献59

共引文献1423

同被引文献183

引证文献12

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部