期刊文献+

伤害性刺激对家兔定量药物脑电图α1频段的影响 被引量:7

Effect of nocuous stimulation on α1-band of quantitative pharmaco-EEG in rabbits
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察伤害性刺激对家兔定量药物脑电图(QPEEG)α1频段的影响。方法:壮年家兔,雌雄不拘,经耳缘静脉注射肌松剂,建立肌松兔模型,在此模型上随机分为擦拭刺激组、钳夹刺激组和切皮刺激组,每组9只,分别给予棉球擦拭、钳夹兔耳缘、做腹正中腹膜外切口3种刺激。应用QPEEG,采用功率谱分析技术,观察刺激前30s及刺激后30s、60s、2min、5min和10min的兔脑α1频段功率百分比的变化。结果:与刺激前相比,擦拭刺激组各脑区α1频段功率百分比无明显改变(P>0.05);钳夹刺激组除左顶、右枕脑区外,α1频段功率百分比在钳夹后30~60s内升高(P<0.05);切皮刺激组在切皮后30s~2min内,各脑区α1频段功率百分比均明显升高(P<0.05)。结论:伤害性刺激引起兔QPEEGα1频段功率百分比升高,提示α1频段功率百分比有可能成为反映镇痛程度的指标。 Aim:To study the effects of nocuous stimulation on α1-band of quantitative pharmaco-EEG(QPEEG) in rabbits.Methods:Rabbits of both sexes which had been injected muscle relaxant by vein were randomly divided into 3 groups:mopping group,forceps holder group,cutting group;9 rabbits in each group.Mopping group was given mopping stimulation,forceps holder group was held ears,the last group was cut on belly.The EEG sample was obtained before 30 s and 30 s,60 s,2 min,5 min and 10 min following the stimulation,and the percentage α1-band power was analyzed.Results:The percentage of α1-band power showed no significant changes in mopping group(P0.05);the percentage of α1-band power increased(P0.05) in forceps holder group within 30~60 s after received stimulation in all the areas except for left cupula and right pulvinar of brain;the percentage of α1-band power in cutting group increased significantly in all the areas of brain within 30 s^2 min(P0.05).Conclusion:After given nocuous stimulation,the percentage of α1-band power increased,which showed that the percentage of α1-band power would be an effective indicator of monitoring pain.
出处 《郑州大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第1期36-39,共4页 Journal of Zhengzhou University(Medical Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目30872432 30471657
关键词 伤害性刺激 定量药物脑电图 α1频段 nociceptive stimulation quantitative pharmaco-EEG α1-band rabbit
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1徐家萱,胡振序,潘松青.家兔颅外头皮脑电图的实验研究[J].湖北医科大学学报,1994,15(3):237-242. 被引量:5
  • 2刘春兰,马民玉.先天性心脏病并肺动脉高压患儿心脏直视手术的麻醉管理[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2005,20(8):813-814. 被引量:4
  • 3肖晓山.临床常用疼痛程度评估方法的评价[J].现代医院,2005,5(12):32-35. 被引量:9
  • 4Kohno T, Kumamoto E, Baba H, et al. Actions of midazolam on GABAergic transmission in substantia gelatinosa neurons of adult rat spinal cord slices. Anesthesiology,2000, 92: 507~515.
  • 5Sonner JM, Antognini JF, Dutton RC, et al. Inhaled anesthetics and immobility: mechanisms, mysteries, and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration. Anesth Analg,2003, 97: 719~740.
  • 6Wang MY, Rampil IJ, Kendig JJ. Ethanol directly depresses AMPA and NMDA glutamate currents in spinal cord motor neurons independent of actions on GABAA or glycine receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1999, 290: 362 ~367.
  • 7Ren SL, Wang MY. Supressive effects of propofol on neonate rat spinal cord motoneurons in vitro. Soc Neurosci Abstr, 2002, 28: 446.6.
  • 8Asai T, Kusudo K, Ikeda H, et al. Effects of halothane on neuronal excitation in the superficial dorsal horn of rat spinal cord slices: evidence for a presynaptic action. Eur J Neurosci, 2002, 15: 1278 ~ 1290.
  • 9Antognini JF, Carstens E, Sudo M, et al. Isoflurane depresses electroencephalographic and medial thalamic responses to noxious stimulation via an indirect spinal action. Anesth Analg, 2000, 91: 1282 ~ 1288.
  • 10Antognini JF, Carstens E, Atherley R. Does the immobilizing effect of thiopental in brain exceed that of halothane?Anesthesiology, 2002, 96: 980 ~ 986.

共引文献21

同被引文献50

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部