期刊文献+

Clinical Observation of a Combination of Acupuncture and Drug Administration for Non-specific Acute Lumbar Sprain

Clinical Observation of a Combination of Acupuncture and Drug Administration for Non-specific Acute Lumbar Sprain
原文传递
导出
摘要 Objective: To observe the clinical effects of a combination of acupuncture and drug administration for non-specific acute lumbar sprain. Methods: Sixty-nine cases were randomly allocated into a combination group, an acupuncture group, and a drug group according to the visiting sequence. Patients in the acupuncture group (n=24) were treated with acupuncture daily for 5 d, 20 patients in the drug group were treated with oral Diclofenac Sodium, 50 mg per time, twice per day, for 5 d, and 25 patients in the combination group were treated with methods in both the acupuncture group and the drug group. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. Results: All patients in the three groups got improvement in pain and movement, the combination group had the best effects (P〈0.01), and there was no significant difference between the acupuncture group and the drug group. Conclusion: Combination of acupuncture and drug has a better effect than single acupuncture or routine treatment of Diclofenac Sodium on acute lumbar sprain. 目的:观察针药并用治疗非特异性急性腰扭伤的临床疗效。方法:将69例患者按就诊川页序随机分为针药并用组、针刺组和药物组。针刺组24例,采用针刺治疗,每日1次,共治疗5次;药物组20例,采用口服双氯芬酸钠治疗,50mg每次,每日2次,连服5日;针药并用纽25例采用与针刺组、药物组相同的针刺和药物治疗。以疼痛量表和下腰痛量表评价临床疗效。结果:三组患者治疗后在疼痛,活动度方面均有一定改善,但针药并用组疗效最佳,与针刺组、药物组比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);针刺组与药物组比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:针药并用治疗急性腰扭伤疗效优于单纯针刺治疗或常规剂量双氯芬酸钠治疗。
作者 刘静 李宁
出处 《Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science》 2010年第1期47-49,共3页 针灸推拿医学(英文版)
关键词 Acupuncture Therapy Acupuncture Medication Combined Low Back Pain Sprains and Strains 针刺疗法 针药并用 腰痛 扭伤和劳损
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain:part I development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain[J].Spine,1983,8(2):141-144.
  • 2Fairbank JC,Couper J,Davies JB,et al.The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire[J].Physiotherapy, 1980,66(8) :271-273.
  • 3Beaton D,Bombardier C,Guillemin F,et al. Guidelines for thee process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J].Spine,2000,25 (24):3186-3191.
  • 4Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain[J]. Lancet, 1974,2:1127-1131.
  • 5Kopec JA.Measuring functional outcomes in persons with back pain:a review of back-specific questionnaires[J].Spine,2000,25(24):3110-3114.
  • 6Rolad M,Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire[J].Spine,2000,25(24):3115-3124.
  • 7Leclaire R,Blier F,Fortin,et al.A cross-sectional study comparing the Oswesty and Roland-Morris functional disability scales in two populations of patients with low back pain of different level of severity[J].Spine, 1997,22( 1 ) :68-71.
  • 8Patrick D, Deyo R, Atlas S, et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatical[J].Spine,1995,20(17):1899-1909.
  • 9Stratford P,Binkley J. Measurement properties of the RM-18:a mofified version of the Roland-Morris disability scale[J].Spine, 1997,22 (20) :2416-2421.
  • 10Deyo RA,Battie M,Beurskens A,et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research:a proposal for standardized use[J].Spine, 1998,23 (18) :2003-2013.

共引文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部