期刊文献+

沟通与刻板印象的维持、变化和抑制 被引量:19

The Impact of Communication on Stereotype Maintenance,Transformation and Inhibition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 沟通提供了维持人类社会行为所必要的信息,是人类交换信息,建立并维持相互联系的工具。刻板印象是一种涉及知觉者对某个群体的知识、观念与期望的认知结构。近年来,研究者们从多个方面探讨了沟通与刻板印象的维持、变化和抑制的关系,发现群体内沟通,通过策略性的信息选择和语言偏差,能够维持刻板印象,并可能使刻板印象极端化;而群际沟通,特别是代理式的群际沟通,则成为抑制刻板印象的一种可能方法。 Communication is a tool for humans to exchange information, which establishes and maintains mutual relationship and social behavior. A stereotype can be defined as "a cognitive structure that contains the pereeiver's knowledge, beliefs, and expectations about a human group". In recent years, researchers have explored various effects of communication on stereotype maintenance, stereotype transformation and stereotype inhibition. Results of these studies showed that 1) ingroup communication maintained stereotypes or led to a polarization of stereotypes with strategic choice of information and biased language; 2) intergroup communication, especially the vicarious intergroup communication, may constitute a possible approach to stereotype inhibition. Identification of these impacts would help to further understand the intergroup communication.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期487-495,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目:合作决策中制裁与权力的影响:以资源困境为切入点(项目号:70971127) 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目:"社会变革时期公众的社会心理问题"(项目号:KSCX2-YW-R-130)资助
关键词 刻板印象 沟通 内群体 外群体 stereotypes communication ingroup outgroup
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1罗震雷,张厚粲,黎岳庭.从刻板印象到类属性思维[J].心理科学,2005,28(3):636-638. 被引量:12
  • 2Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of.the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843-856.
  • 3Brauer, M., Judd, C. M., & Jacquelin, V. (2001). The communication of social stereotypes: The effects of group discussion and information distribution on stereotypic appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,463-475.
  • 4Cameron, L., & Rutland, A. (2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children's prejudice toward the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 469-488.
  • 5Cameron, L., Rutland, A., & Brown, R. (2007). Promoting children's positive intergroup attitudes towards stigmatized groups: Extended contact and multiple classification skills training. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 454-466.
  • 6Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., & Douch, R. (2006). Changing Children's Intergroup Attitudes toward Refugees: Testing Different Models of Extended Contact. Child Development, 77, 1208-1219.
  • 7Clark, A. E., & Kashima, Y. (2007). Stereotypes Help People Connect With Others in the Community: A Situated Functional Analysis of the Stereotype Consistency Bias in Communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1028-1039.
  • 8Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682-696.
  • 9Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., McGarty, C. (2008). Strategic language use in interpersonal and intergroup communication. In Y. Kashima, K. Fiedler, & P. Frytag (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to the formation, maintenance, and transformation of stereotypes. (pp. 189-212). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 10Gomez, A., & Huici, C. (2008). Vicarious intergroup contact and the role of authorities in prejudice reduction. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 103-114.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Hamilton D. L., Trolier T. K. Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In: J. F. Dovidio, Gaertner(Eds.). Prejudice, discrimination and racism. New York: Academic Press, 1986:127-163.
  • 2Rosenberg S., Nelson C., Vivekananthan P. S. A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968,9:283-294.
  • 3Ashmore R. D., Del F. K. Boca. What research on physical attractiveness can teach us. In: Lee J. Jussim(Ed.). Accuracy of stereotypes: toward appreciating group differences. Washing, DC:American Psychological Association, 1995:64.
  • 4Hilton J. L, Hippel W. Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology,1996, 47:237-271.
  • 5Lee Y. T., Jussim L., McMcauley C. Accuracy of stereotypes:toward appreciating group differences. Washing, DC: The American Psychological Association, 1995:30-32.
  • 6Lippman W. Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan, 1922, In..Jeffrey L., Eward G. C., Paul M. S. The empirical dimensionality of racial stereotype. Public opinion quarterly. Chicago, 1999,63:371-385.
  • 7Triandis H. C. , Vassiliou V. Frequency of contact and stereotyping.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967,7:316-328.
  • 8Funder D. C. Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 1987,101:75-90.
  • 9Judd C. M., Park B. Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1993,100:109-128.
  • 10Allport G. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954, 20-23, In: Lee J. Jussim(Ed.). Accuracy of stereotypes: toward appreciating group differences. Washing, DC:American Psychological Association, 1995.

共引文献11

同被引文献264

引证文献19

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部