领导—部属交换与员工组织公民行为:组织公平的缓冲作用实证研究被引量：2

Empirical research on the relationship among leader-member exchange,organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过在上海、浙江等地按照"配比研究"的办法来选择研究样本进行结构化问卷调查,最终得到有效的主管/部属配对数据218条。据此,本研究采用验证性因子分析(CFA)、相关分析和层次回归分析法,检验了组织中领导—部属交换与组织公民行为的关系,以及组织公平在这一关系间的缓冲作用。研究结果表明:领导—部属交换与组织公民行为有显著的正相关;组织公平与组织公民行为有显著的正相关;组织公平对领导-部属交换和组织公民行为的关系具有一定程度的缓冲作用。 Using a cross-organizational sample of 218 supervisor-subordinate dyads in Shanghai and other provinces, we examined the relationship among leader-member exchange （LMX）, organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior （OCB） through factor analysis, correlative analysis and hierarchical regression analysis. The results suggested that （1） Leader-member exchange（LMX） was significantly related to organizational citizenship behavior; （2） Organizational justice was significantly related to organizational citizenship behavior; （3） Organizational justice moderated the relationship between leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior.

作者康力

机构地区上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院

出处《上海管理科学》 CSSCI 2010年第1期84-88,共5页 Shanghai Management Science

关键词领导—部属交换组织公平组织公民行为 Leader-Member Exchange Organizational Justice Organizational Citizenship Behavior

分类号 C933 [经济管理—管理学] F272.92 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Graen G B, Cashman J. A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In: J G Hunt & L. L. Larson Eds. Leadership frontiers. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1975. 143- 166.
2Dansereau F Jr, Graen G, Haga W J. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations-a longitudi nal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975,13 :46-78.
3Graen G. B. , Uhl-Bien M. Relationship based approach to leadership: Development of leader member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi level multi domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 1995.
4Liden, R. C. , S.J. Wayne, and D. Stilwell, A longitudinal study on the early development of leader member exchanges. Journal of applied psychology, 1993. 78(4) : p. 662-674.
5Thibaut, J. W. , & Walker, L. Procedural Justice; A Psychological Analysis: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1975.
6Bies R J, Moag J F. Interactional justice: Communication crite ria of fairness. In: Lewicki R J, Sheppard B H, Bazerman M H ed. Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986. 43-55.
7Greenberg, J. , Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Journal of Management, 1990, 16(2): p. 399.
8Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol, 86 (3) : 386-400.
9Smith, C. A. , D.W. Organ, and J. P. Near, Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature and antecedents. Journal of applied psychology, 1983. 68(4): p. 653-663.
10Farh J. L. , Earley P. C. , Lin S. , Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and extra-role behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997.