期刊文献+

自杀可能性量表的信效度研究 被引量:15

Study on Reliability and Validity of the Suicide Probability Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本研究检验了国外"自杀可能性量表"(Suicide Probability Scale,SPS)中文版适用性。方法通过对原问卷"翻译-回译"过程建立中文翻译版,选取367名大学生被试进行测试,其中100人在2周后进行了重测。通过探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析检验其结构效度,通过与SSI问卷的比较计算相容效度,通过相关分析考察问卷的信度。结果SPS中文版的探索性因素分析(因子载荷绝对值0.433~0.915)和验证性因素分析(RESEA=0.047,NNFI=0.901,CFI=0.915,IFI=0.916),结果都与原问卷相符合,与SSI问卷比较发现SPS具有良好的效度指数(α=0.765);问卷的内部一致性信度在0.701~0.889之间,分半信度在0.693~0.881之间,重测信度在0.623~0.848之间,均达到了心理测量学的要求。结论修订后的中文版SPS具有良好的信效度指标,可以作为评定中国大学生自杀企图的测量工具使用。 Objective To explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SPS. Methods With a "translate-translate back" process, we built the SPS in Chinese. A sample of 367 college students were investigated and 100 students were retested two weeks later. The construct validity was checked with the analysis of EFA and CFA. The congruent validity was calculated with SSI. The reliability was with the analysis of correlation. Results The factor analysis confirmed the structure of the original version (EFA: absolute load value between 0. 433-0. 915;CFA: RESEA=0. 047,NNFI=0. 901,CFI=0. 915,IFI=0. 916 ). Compared with SSI, the results showed good validity (a= 0. 765), The Cronbach's a was between 0. 701 and 0. 889 ,Split-half reliability was between 0. 693 and 0. 881, retest reliability was between 0. 623 and 0. 848. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SPS was supported and it can be used to test suicide attempt of Chinese college students.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2010年第2期225-227,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 大学生自杀与自杀行为的心理解剖研究(NIHR01MH068560-01A2) 美国国家卫生研究院(2006-2008)
关键词 自杀 探索性因素分析 验证性因素分析 信度 效度 Suicide EFA CFA Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1王黎君,费立鹏,黄正京,张艳萍,赵云霞,杨功焕.中国人群自杀死亡报告准确性评估[J].中华流行病学杂志,2003,24(10):889-892. 被引量:63
  • 2杨婉秋 李辉.自杀行为的心理学分析[J].国际中华神经精神医学杂志,2003,4(5):340-340.
  • 3Mehmet, Eskin. Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Perceived Social Support From Friends and Family Scales,Scale for Interpersonal Behavior, and Suicide Probability Scale[J]. Journal of. Clinical Psychology, 1993,49(4) : 515-522.
  • 4Michael Eltz, Allison Schettini Evans , Mark Cello, et al. Suicide Probability Scale and its Utility with Adolescent Psychiatric Patients [J]. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2007,38(1) : 17-29.
  • 5John G, Cull,Gill Wayne S. Suicide Probability Scale (SPS) http:// www. wpspublish.com/.
  • 6Beck A T, Kovacs M, Weissman A. Assessment of suicidal intention:The Scale for Suicide Ideation[J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979,47 (2) :343-352.
  • 7张杰,宋振韶.自杀意向量表在中国高中学生中的评估——信度和效度研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2007,17(6):367-368. 被引量:5
  • 8温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194. 被引量:1249
  • 9Schermelleh--Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Muller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models:Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures[J]. Methods of Psychological Research Online,2003,8(1) :23-74.

二级参考文献53

  • 1傅小玲,王择青,杨君.自杀危险性评估研究进展[J].临床精神医学杂志,2005,15(1):52-53. 被引量:7
  • 2樊富珉.我国青少年自杀研究及预防对策[J].临床精神医学杂志,2005,15(4):241-242. 被引量:29
  • 3[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 4[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 5[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 6[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 7[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 8[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 9[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 10[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993

共引文献1314

同被引文献166

引证文献15

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部