期刊文献+

分析性叙述:为复杂的历史进程建模 被引量:4

Modeling Complex Historical Processes with Analytic Narratives
原文传递
导出
摘要 分析性叙述研究计划表达了一种使已经被许多学者所采用的,即把历史的比较研究和理性选择模型结合起来的研究进路更加清晰、更加明确的努力。为了理解制度起源与变迁的实际情况,分析性叙述坚持把对具体案例的深刻把握与精确理论模型相结合。然而,这些条件还不足以使分析性叙述与其他娴熟的比较历史研究相区别。这篇文章的核心在于阐释“是什么构成了分析性叙述研究进路”,以及“它与其他进行严格比较历史研究的研究进路有什么区别”两大问题。 Both research with case and building model are common research ways in social science. They look very different but in deep relation with each other. Unless they integrate together, there isn't a progress of social science. This paper argues the approach systemically, such as content, essence and theoretic shelf, and so on. It also argues that analytic narrative go beyond the old rational choice method and research the special institution in special historic context with game theory. So social science can explain rebellion and revolution, state transforming and other important historical processes better.
出处 《经济学(季刊)》 2010年第1期771-786,共16页 China Economic Quarterly
基金 沈阳化工学院博士科研基金的大力资助
关键词 历史进程 比较历史研究 建模 理性选择模型 制度起源 计划表 Analytic Narrative, Strategy in Equilibrium, Path Dependence
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Bates, R. , "The International Coffee Organization: An International Institution", in Bates, R. et al. , Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998, 194--230.
  • 2Bates, R. et al. , Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.
  • 3Bates, R. , "Analytic Narratives Revisited", Social Science History, 2000(a), 24(4), 685--696.
  • 4Bates, R. , "The Analytic Narrative Project", American Political Science Review, 2000 (b), 94 (3), 696--702.
  • 5Carpenter, D. , "What is the Marginal Value of Analytic Narratives?" Social Science History, 2000, 24(4), 653--668.
  • 6Elster, J. , "A Plea for Mechanisms", in Hedstrom, P. , and R. Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 45--73.
  • 7Elster, J. , Alchemies of the Mind : Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • 8Elster, J. , "Rational Choice History: A Case of Excessive Ambition", American Political Science Review, 2000, 94(3), 685--695.
  • 9George, A. , "Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison" ,, in Lawrence , P. (ed.), Diplomacy : NewApproaches in History, Theory, and Policy. New York: Free Press, 1989, 43 68.
  • 10George, A. , and A. Bennett, Case Study and Theory Development. Cambridge: The MIT Press, forthcoming.

同被引文献91

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部