期刊文献+

社会经济地位与心理障碍相关性的多水平模型分析 被引量:5

A multilevel analysis on the association between socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨社会经济地位(SES)与社区人群心理障碍的相关性。方法利用浙江省15岁以上人群精神病流行病学调查数据(n=14632),采用多水平logistic回归模型拟合个休SES维度(教育、收入、职业)和地理SES维度(居住地区)与心理障碍的相关性。心理障碍评定采用GHQ-12(分界值为3/4)。结果浙江省社区人群心理障碍的患病率为18.5%(95%CI:17.9%~19.1%),略高于河北省的16.7%(u=4.39,P〈0.001)。年家庭人均收入、职业等SES指标与心理障碍相关性较大;低收入组(相对于高收入组)OR=3.45,95%CI:1.72~6.67;无业/失业组(相对于非农业劳动者)OR=2.03,95%CI:1.73~2.40;心理障碍存县(市)水平具有集聚性,但作用较小;教育程度对心理障碍无影响。结论丰十区人群心理障碍与SES呈逆向梯度变化趋势,且主要与个体SES维度有关,地理SES维度(居住地区)有影响,但作用很小。 Objective To explore the association between psychiatric disorders and socioeconomic status such as education, income, employment and area of community settings in Zhejiang province. Methods Data were from the epidemiological survey of mental illnesses aged 15 and older in 2001 (n=14 632). Psychiatric disorders were measured by GHQ-12 with a cut-point 4. Logistic multilevel analysis was the main statistical method being used. Results The overall prevalence of psychiatric disorders was 18.5% (95% confidence intervals, 17.9% to 19.1% ), higher than the data from Hebei province (u=4.39, P〈0.001 ). Annual household income and employment were strongly associated with psychiatric disorders especially for those with low income (odds ratio 3.45,95%CI: 1.72-6.67) and unemployment (odds ratio 2.03,95%CI: 1.73-2.40). Factors as regional effect and education level showed weak or inconsistent association with psychiatric disorders alter controlling on other indicators. Conclusion Inverse gradient relation between psychiatric disorders and SES seemed as the main result of low SES individual characteristics and some minor effects at the county level.
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期171-174,共4页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
关键词 心理障碍 社会经济地位 多水平模型 一般健康问卷 Psychiatric disorder Socioeconomic status Multilevel model General health questionnaire
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Mueller CW, Parcel TL. Measures of socioeconomic status: alternatives and recommendations. Child Dev, 1981,52 : 13-30.
  • 2Shavers VL. Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. J Natl Med Assoc, 2007,99 (9) : 1013 - 1023.
  • 3Lorant V, Deliege D, Eaton W, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol, 2003, 157: 98- 112.
  • 4Laaksonen E, Martikainen P, Lahelma E, et al. Socioeconomic circumstances and common mental disorders among Finnish and British public sector employees: evidence from the Helsinki Health Study and the Whitehall Ⅱ Study. Int J Epidemiol, 2007, 36(4) : 776-786.
  • 5Lahelma E, Laaksonen M, Martikainen P, et al. Multiple measures of socioeconomic circumstances and common mental disorders. Soc Sci Med,2006,63(5) : 1383-1399.
  • 6Bijl RV, Ravelli A, van Zessen G. Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population: results of the netherlands mental health survey and incidence study (NEMESIS). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 1998,33 : 587-595.
  • 7Araya R,Lewis G,Rojas G, et al. Education and income: which is more important for mental health? J Epidemiol Community Health, 2003,7(7 ) : 501-505.
  • 8Goldberg DP, Gater R,SartoriusN,et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med, 1997,27:191-197.
  • 9Cheng TA, Wu JT,Chong MY,et al. Internal consistency and factor structure of the Chinese Health Questionnaire. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1990,82 : 304-308.
  • 10Shek DT. Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire. J Clin Psychol, 1987,43 (6) : 683-691.

二级参考文献50

  • 1石其昌,章健民,徐方忠,费立鹏,许毅,傅永利,顾卫,周夏江,王淑敏,张滢,俞敏.浙江省15岁及以上人群精神疾病流行病学调查[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(4):229-236. 被引量:297
  • 2金华 张明园.中国正常人SCL-90评定结果初步分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1986,12(5):260-260.
  • 3郭祖超.医用数理统计方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1988..
  • 4王征宇.临床症状量表(SCL-90)[J].上海精神医学,1984,2:68-70.
  • 5中国卫生年鉴委员会.中国卫生年鉴1992[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1992.637-638.
  • 6中华医学会精神病学分会.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第3版)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.4..
  • 7柯惠新 等.调查研究中的统计分析法[M].北京:北京广播学院出版社,1996.361,363,371,360,484.
  • 8Goldberg D. The general health questionnaire. In: McDowell I,Newer C, eds. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.225-237.
  • 9Nott PN,Cutts S. Validity of the 30-item general health questionnaire in postpartum women. Psychological Medicine,1982,12:409-413.
  • 10Mari J J, Williams P. A comparison of the validity of two psychiatric screening questionnaires ( GHQ-12 and SRQ-20 ) in brazil, using relative operating characteristic ( ROC ) analysis. Psychological Medicine, 1985,15: 651-659.

共引文献684

同被引文献51

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部