期刊文献+

基于个体的标准化法——倾向评分加权 被引量:14

Introduction to an individual-based standardization method -- propensity score weighting
原文传递
导出
摘要 倾向评分加权是利用倾向评分值对每个观察单位进行加权调整。由于倾向评分将许多协变量综合为一个变量,因此通过倾向评分加权可以使各混杂变量在两组人群中的分布趋于一致。根据渊整后标准人群的不同分为两种加权方法:逆处理概率加权法(IPTW)和标准化死亡比加权法(SMRW)。本文实例分析表明,用IPTW和SMRW加权调整后处理组和对照组妇女各混杂变量的分布均趋于一致,两种方法调整后的效应估计基本相同。本文介绍倾向评分加权法的篡本原珈、且体方法.并结合章例探讨了萁存浠行病学巾的府用. In this article, we presented the rationale and calculation procedures of a propensity score weighting method, with its application in epidemiological studies. The rationale for propensity score weighting method is similar to those for traditional standardization methods. Propensity score is used to estimate the weight for each individual. As the propensity score serves the function of observed covariates, the propensity score weighting can balance the distribution of the observed covariates between the comparison groups. There are two weighting methods according to the target standard populations: the Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and the Standardized mortality ratio weighting (SMRW). Results of the example show that the distribution of the covariates tended to be consistent after weighting, and the IPTW and SMRW methods showed similar effect estimates. Propensity score weighting method can effectively balance the distribution of the confounding factors between the compared groups in non-randomized controlled trials.
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期223-226,共4页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
关键词 倾向评分加权 标准化法 混杂偏倚 Propensity score weighting Standardization method Confounding bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 1983,70:41-55.
  • 2Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Star, 1985,39:33-38.
  • 3D' Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med, 1998,17(19) :2265-2281.
  • 4赵守军,张勇,汪萱怡,高燕宁.均衡组间差异的有效方法:倾向评分[J].中华流行病学杂志,2003,24(6):516-519. 被引量:14
  • 5李智文,张乐,刘建蒙,任爱国.倾向评分配比在流行病学设计中的应用[J].中华流行病学杂志,2009,30(5):514-517. 被引量:29
  • 6Baser O. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value Health, 2006, 9(6): 377-385.
  • 7Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B. Marginal slruetural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 2000, 11 (5) : 550-560.
  • 8Sato T, Matsuyama Y. Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization. Epidemiology, 2003,14 (6) : 680-686.
  • 9Heman MA, Brumback B, Robins JM. Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology, 2000, 11 (5) : 561-570.
  • 10Sturmer T, Rothman K J, Glynn RJ. Insights into different results from different causal contrasts in the presence of effect-measure modification. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2006,15: 698-709.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Star Med, 2008,27(12):2037-2049.
  • 2Rubin DB, Thomas N. Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice, Biometrics, 1996, 52: 249-264.
  • 3Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of file propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 1983, 70:41-55.
  • 4Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat, 1985, 39:33-38.
  • 5Rubin DB. Bias reduction using Mahalanobis metric matching. Biometrics, 1980, 36:293-298.
  • 6Baser O. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value Health, 2006, 9(6): 377-385.
  • 7D' Agostino RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a nortrandomized control group. Stat Med, 1998,17 (19) : 2265-2281.
  • 8Jones AS. Maternal alcohol abuse/dependence, children's behavior problems, and home environment: estimates from the National Longitudinal StLrvey of Youth using propensity score matching. J Stud Alcohol Drugs, 2007, 68(2) : 266-275.
  • 9Trujillo A J, Portillo JE, Vernon JA. The impact of subsidized health insurance for the poor: evaluating the Colombian experience using propensity score matching. Int J Health Care Finance Econ, 2005, 5(3) :211-239.
  • 10Do MP, Kincaid DL. Impact of an entertainment-education television drama on health knowledge and behavior in Bangladesh: an application of propensity score matching. J Health Commun, 2006, 11 (3) : 301-325.

共引文献40

同被引文献129

引证文献14

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部