期刊文献+

采用故障树分析诊断系统故障的改进方法 被引量:30

An improved method for system fault diagnosis using fault tree analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了优化系统诊断过程,提出一种采用故障树分析诊断系统故障的改进方法.通过故障树分析,求出所有最小割集、最小割集发生概率、组成单元的诊断重要度.诊断重要度大的最小割集优先诊断,最小割集中诊断重要度大的组成单元优先诊断.当最小割集中诊断重要度最大的组成单元故障时,包含该组成单元的最小割集应该优先诊断.根据组成单元的诊断顺序,生成系统的诊断决策树.这种方法弥补了仅以组成单元的诊断重要度确定最小割集诊断顺序的不足,使得发生概率大的最小割集可以优先诊断,优化了诊断过程.通过实例验证了该故障诊断方法的有效性. This paper proposes an improved method to diagnose system faults using fault tree analysis to optimize system diagnosis.All minimal cut sets,their occurrence probabilities and the diagnosis importance of components were determined via fault tree analysis used for system reliability.The order by which the minimal cut sets were checked depended on the diagnosis importance.Components with larger diagnosis importance within a cut set were checked first.Meanwhile,the minimal cut sets containing the component with the largest diagnosis importance were also diagnosed first when the component was fault.According to the diagnostic sequence of system components,a diagnostic decision tree was generated.This method offsets the insufficiency caused by the diagnostic sequence which is merely determined by the diagnosis importance of components.Therefore,the minimal cut set which has larger occurrence probability can be checked first,and the system diagnosis is optimized.An example is given to demonstrate the efficiency of this method.
出处 《哈尔滨工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期143-147,共5页 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划资助项目(2007AA11Z247)
关键词 故障树分析 故障诊断 最小割集 诊断重要度 诊断决策树 fault tree analysis fault diagnosis minimal cut set diagnostic importance factor diagnostic decision tree
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1ASSAF T, DUGAN J B. Automatic generation of diagnostic expert systems from fault trees [ C ]//Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003 Annual. Tampa Florida, USA: IEEE Reliability Society, 2003 : 143 - 147.
  • 2ASSAF T, DUGAN J B. Diagnostic expert systems from dynamic fault trees [ C ]//Reliability and Maintainability Annual Symposium-RAMS. Los Angeles, CA, Unites states: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004:444-450.
  • 3ASSAF T, DUGAN J B. Diagnosis based on reliability analysis using monitors and sensors [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, 93 (4): 509 - 521.
  • 4倪绍徐,张裕芳,易宏,梁晓锋.基于故障树的智能故障诊断方法[J].上海交通大学学报,2008,42(8):1372-1375. 被引量:78
  • 5REAY K A, ANDREWS J D. A fault tree analysis strategy using binary decision diagrams [ J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002, 78 ( 1 ) : 45 - 46.
  • 6RAUZY A. New algorithms for fauh tree analysis [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1993, 40 (3) : 203 -211.
  • 7DU Suguo, SUN Yan. A novel ordering method of binary decision diagram [ C ]//International Conference on Management Science & Engineering. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007 : 299 - 304.
  • 8TANG Z, DUGAN J B. Minimal Cut Set/Sequence Generation for Dynamic Fault Trees [ C]//Reliability and Maintainability Annual Symposium. Los Angeles, CA, Unites states: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004 : 207 - 213.
  • 9ASSAF T, DUGAN J B. Design for diagnosis using a diagnostic evaluation measure [ J ]. Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, IEEE, 2006, 9 (4) : 37 -43.
  • 10徐克俊,金星,郑勇煌.航c射场可靠性安全性评估与分析技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2006:134-138.

二级参考文献1

  • 1维齐利W E. 故障树手册[M]. 北京:原子能出版社,1987.

共引文献77

同被引文献201

引证文献30

二级引证文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部