期刊文献+

非填塞性鼻腔手术的效果 被引量:3

Nasal endoscopic surgery without nasal packing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨非填塞性鼻腔手术的优缺点。方法所有鼻内镜手术患者随机分为2组:A组(n=226例,术后鼻腔不填塞,仅以菲薄的生物胶覆盖创面)和B组(n=50例,术后鼻腔用医用膨胀海绵或凡士林油纱条填塞),临床数据比较分析。鼻腔术后仅对活动性出血进行彻底止血,创面渗血则不予处理,鼻腔不填塞保持通畅。结果非填塞患者与填塞患者相比,术后渗血时间及渗血量无明显差异,而术后头痛、鼻阻等并发症则明显好于填塞患者(均P〈0.01)。结论鼻腔术后不填塞,能显著减轻患者头痛、鼻塞等并发症而术后渗血等不良反应无明显增加。 Objective To approach the merit and demerit of endoscopic sinus surgery without nasal packing. Methods A retrospective analysis of 276 cases of nasal endoscopic surgery was performed between April 2007 and May 2008 in the General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces. All patients were divided into two groups according to postoperative nasal packing: group A (n=226, no packing) and group B (n=50, medical sponge or oiled gauze). The clinical symptoms and complications were compared with two groups. The active bleeding in the surgery must be stopped thoroughly. The errhysis in the wound surface can not be dealt with. The patient without nasal packing could keep the nasal cavity unobstructed. Results There was no significant difference in the time and the quantity of the postoperative nasal errhysis between two groups. The group B, as compared with the Group A, there was significant difference in the headache and nasal obstruction after the surgery. Conclusion The nasal endoscopic surgery without nasal packing has the advantage causing significantly less pain and less obstructive in nasal cavity. No nasal packing should be considered the procedure of choice for performing the nasal endoscopic surgery.
出处 《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》 2010年第2期147-148,153,共3页 China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
关键词 鼻内镜手术 鼻腔填塞物 Nasal endoscopic surgery Nasal packing
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1[1]FISAHMAN B,PASTERNAK S,WALLENSTEIN SL,et al.The memorial pain assessment card[J].Cancer,1987,60:1151- 1158.
  • 2[2]RHIND VM,BIRD NA, WRIGHT V.A comparison of clinical assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis[J].Annals of the Rheumatic Disease,1980,39:135- 137.
  • 3[3]HUSKISSON EC,JONE J,SCOTT PJ.Application of visual analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity[J].Rheumatology and Rehabilitation,1976,15:185- 187.
  • 4[4]DOWNIE WW,LEATHAM PA,RHIND VM.Studies with pain rating scales[J].Annals of the Rheumatics Diseases,1978, 37: 378- 381.
  • 5[5]WILKIE D,LOVEJOY N,DODD M,et al.Cancer pain intensity measurement:concurrent validity of three tools- finger dynameter,pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale[J].Hospice Journal,1990, 6:1- 13.
  • 6[6]MARCHAND S,BUSHNELL MC,DUNCAN GH.Modulation of heat pa- in perception by high frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,1991,1: 122- 129.
  • 7[7]PRICE DD,BUSH FM,LONG S,et al.A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scale[J].Pain,1994, 56: 217- 226.
  • 8[8]JESEN MP,MCFARLAND CA.Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients[J].Pain,1993,55:195- 203.
  • 9[9]RANSFORD AO, CAIRNS D,MOONEY V.The Pain drawing as an aid to the psychological evaluation of patients with low- back pain[J].Spine,1976,1(2):127- 134.
  • 10[10]MARGOLIS RB,CHIBNALL JT,TAIT RC.Test- retest reliability of the pain draw instrument[J].Pain,1988,33:49- 51.

共引文献603

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部