期刊文献+

中国膳食暴露评估模型软件开发及验证 被引量:6

Development and verification of Chinese dietary exposure evaluation model software
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的开发具有我国自主知识产权的膳食暴露评估模型软件,并按国际通用标准对其概率评估模型进行合理性和计算正确性验证。方法基于我国膳食调查及食品污染物监测数据,采用统计分析系统(SAS)编程技术建立膳食暴露评估模型计算模块和人机对话界面。使用全国2~7岁儿童膳食暴露概率评估模型的结果与点估引吸江苏省金湖地区2~7岁儿童双份饭研究结果相比较的方法验证模型的合理性。通过随机抽取10000人天的膳食暴露数据与@Risk软件计算结果相比较的方法验证软件外部计算的正确性;以模型计算的2~3岁儿童食物消费量及铅污染残留浓度数据的均数漂移为指标验证本软件内部计算的正确性。结果成功开发了包括多种膳食暴露评估模型并具有易于操作用户界面的中国膳食暴露评估模型软件。在合理性验证方面,概率评估模型结果低于点估计,其中黄瓜的乙酰甲胺磷膳食暴露点估计为4.78μg·kg^-1·d^-1,概率评估的P99.9为0.39μg·kg^-1·d^-1;同时概率评估高于双份饭结果,儿童铅膳食暴露概率评估P95为11.08μg·kg^-1·d^-1,双份饭P95为5.75μg·k^1·d^-1。在计算正确性验证方面,概率评估模型计算结果与@Risk结果接近,乙酰甲胺磷膳食暴露概率评估计算的P95为4.27μg·kg^-1·d^-1,@Risk计算的P95为4.24μg·b^-1·d^-1;消费量及污染物的均数漂移表现为以零为中心的随机误差分布,漂移范围为0.05%~11.9%。结论开发的中国膳食暴露评估模型软件计算正确,结果合理,对提升我国膳食暴露评估技术水平具有现实意义。 Objective To develop the dietary exposure evaluation model software accredited of Chinese intellectual property rights and to verify the rationality and accuracy of the results from the probabilistie model in Chinese dietary exposure evaluation model software according to international standards. Methods The software of SAS was used to build various evaluation model based on the data from Chinese dietary survey and the chemical compound in food surveillance and to design an operation interface. The results from probabilistic dietary exposure model for children 2 - 7 years old were compared with that from duplicate portion study of 2 - 7 years children dietary exposure in Jinhu, Jiangsu province in order to analyze the rationality of model. The results from probabilistic model of dietary exposure were compared with the results from @Risk software to verify the correction of the probabilistie model by using the same data of randomly selected 10 000 study subjects from national dietary survey. While,the mean drift was used as an internal index to illustrate the accuracy of the computation. Results Chinese dietary exposure evaluation software was developed successfully. On the rationality, the results from probabilistic model were lower than that from the point estimation (e. g. , cucumber: the result of point estimation of acephate was 4.78 μg·kg^-1·d^-1 ,while the results of probabilistic model which was 0. 39 μg·kg^-1·d^-1). Meanwhile the results from probabilistic model were higher than the results of duplicate portion study ( on the P95 ,the result of prohabilistic model of Pb exposure in children was 11.08 μg·kg^-1·d^-1 ,while the results of duplicate portion study was 5.75 μg·kg^-1·d^-1). On accuracy, the results from @Risk and the probabilistic model were highly consistent (on the P95 ,the result of probabilistic assessment of acephate diet exposure was 4. 27 μg·kg^-1·d^-1,while the results of duplicate portion study was 4. 24 μg·kg^-1·d^-1) , and the mean drift was of random distribution, the drift region varied from 0. 05% to 11.9%. Conclusion The results computed by the software of Chinese dietary exposure evaluation model are reliable and reasonable,which is a meaningful step to improve the dietary exposure evaluation technique in China.
出处 《中华预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期204-208,共5页 Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(30671763) 国家“十一五”科技支撑计划(2006BAK02A01)
关键词 模型 统计学 膳食调查 软件设计 软件确认 Models, statistical Diet surveys Software design Software validation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1杨丽,朱运平.国际食品法典委员会(CAC) 食品与饲料分类标准研究[J].世界标准化与质量管理,2006(12):36-37. 被引量:7
  • 2徐秦.Monte-Carlo方法的应用[J].中国卫生统计,1996,13(5):57-58. 被引量:2
  • 3DABEKA R W,MCKENZIE A D,BRADLEY P. Survey of total mercury in total diet food composites and an estimation of the dietary intake of mercury by adults and children from two Canadian cities [ J ]. Food Add Cont,2003, 20(7) :29-38.
  • 4FRANZ R, MAUER A, WELLE F. European survey on post-consumer poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) materials to determine contamination levels and maximum consumer exposure from food packages made from recycled PET[J]. Food Add Cont,2004, 21(3) :65-86.
  • 5FAO. Codex classification of foods and feeds, codex aliment arius, volume 2 pesticide residues in food. 2nd ed. Appendix 3.Rome: FAO. 1993.
  • 6ZARTARIAN V G, XUE J, OZKAYNAK H A, et al. A probabilistic arsenic exposure assessment for children who contact chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated playsets and decks, part 2: sensitivity and uncertainty analyses[J]. Risk Analy, 2006, 26(2):33-41.
  • 7CALDAS E D, TRESSOU J, BOON P E. Dietary exposure of brazilian consumers to dithiocarbamate pesticides: a probabilistic approach [ J]. Food Chem Toxicol, 2006, 44(9):1562-1571.
  • 8SAS Institute Inc. Getting start with SAS/AF and frames. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA, 2006, 3-40.
  • 9SAS Institute Inc. SAS Component languange 9.1. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA, 2004, 9-15.
  • 10SAS Institute Inc. SAS/AF 9. 1 Procedure guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA, 2004, 23-25.

共引文献46

同被引文献92

  • 1李筱薇,高俊全,王永芳,陈君石.2000年中国总膳食研究—膳食砷摄入量[J].卫生研究,2006,35(1):63-66. 被引量:52
  • 2高俊全,李筱薇,赵京玲.2000年中国总膳食研究——膳食铅、镉摄入量[J].卫生研究,2006,35(6):750-754. 被引量:82
  • 3张磊,高俊全,李筱薇.2000年中国总膳食研究——不同性别年龄组人群膳食铅摄入量[J].卫生研究,2007,36(4):459-467. 被引量:32
  • 4陈君石,高俊全.1992年中国总膳食研究—化学污染物(一)不同地区的比较[J].卫生研究,1997,26(3):199-203. 被引量:20
  • 5de Boer WJ, van der Voet H. MCRA, Release 5, a web-based program for Monte Carlo Risk Assessment[ R/OL]. Biometris and RIKILT. Wageningen University and Research eentre. RIVM, Centre for Substances and Integrated Risk Assessment, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. 2006. [ 2008-11- 101. http ://mcra. rikilt. wur. nl/Documentation/Manual5.pdf.
  • 6Wright JP, Shaw MC, Keeler I,C. Refinements irl acute dietary exposure assessments for chlorpyrifos. J Agric Food Chem,2002, 50 : 235-241.
  • 7Chemical concentrations in food-pesticide residues [ R/OL ]. 2001 [ 2008-07-12]. http ://montecarlo. tehpe. ted. ie/reports/pdf/p5_ WP2_report. pdf.
  • 8Efron B. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc, 1987,82 : 171-185.
  • 9Cullen AC, Frey HC. Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment: A Handbook for Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1999.
  • 10Thompson KM. Variability and uncertainty meet risk management and risk communication. Risk Anal ,2002,22: 647-654.

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部