期刊文献+

高血压脑出血水囊置换引流血肿腔的脑保护机制临床应用分析

The clinical application of protective mechanism in brain of ACRDHC for HICH
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:高血压脑出血病人的手术治疗问题一直受到关注,本文分析高血压脑出血水囊置换引流血肿腔的脑保护作用。方法:对30例高血压脑内血肿病人进行血肿清除手术,将术后常规放置的引流管,改用双腔导尿管水囊引流支撑血肿腔,术后再慢慢将水囊抽掉。结果:30例高血压脑内血肿病人术后复查CT,未发现术区再次出现血肿。结论:脑内血肿急性减压后出现脑再灌注损伤,正常灌注压突破可以造成脑损害,水囊置换引流血肿腔可有效减轻再灌注损伤及正常灌注压突破,起到脑保护的作用,是预防高血压脑内血肿术后再次出血的关键技术。 Objective :The operations for patients of HICH are paid many attention in many researches, well analyse the protective effect in brain of aqeuous capsule replacement in drainaging hematoma cavity (ACRDHC) for HICH. Methods:clear away the hematomas in 30 pa- tients of HICH, after that, change the normal drainagive tube with double cavity catheter, take out the aqeuous capsule in the end. Results: review of head CT after the operations for the 30 patients of HICH: no hematoma again in the area of operations. Conclusion:reperfusion injury is often induced by acuted decompression in brain hematoma, normal perfusion pressure breakthrough may induce brain injury, ACRDHC can alleviate reperfusion injuryf and normal perfusion pressure breakthrough effectively and protect the brain, so it's a pivotal technic in prevening rehemorrhage after the opearations of brain hematoma caused by hypertension.
出处 《医学信息(下旬刊)》 2010年第3期67-68,共2页 Medical information
基金 2006年广东省科技计划项目(项目号:63050)
关键词 高血压脑出血 再灌注损伤 正常灌注压突破 Hypertension Intracerebral hemorrhage reperfusion injury normal perfusion pressure breakthrough
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1Kazui S, Naritomi H, Yamamoto H, et al. Enlargement of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Incidence and time course [ J ]. J Nenrosurg,1990, 72(10): 1783 -1787.
  • 2Fujji Y, Takeuchi S, Sasaki O, et al. Multivariate analysis of predictors of hematoma enlargement in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Stroke, 1998, 29(6): 1160-1166.
  • 3Wagner K R, Xi G, Hua Y, et al. Ultra-early clot aspiration after lysis with tissue plasminogen activator in a porcine model of intracerebral hemorrhage: edema reduction and blood-brain barrier protection[J]. J Neurosurg, 1999, 90(3): 491 -498.
  • 4Gebel J M, Brott T G, Sila C A, et al. Decreased perihematomal edema in thrombolysis-reduced intracerebral hemorrhage compared with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[ J]. Stroke, 2000, 31 (3): 596- 600.
  • 5Akopov S E, Simonian N A, Grigorian G S. Dynamic polymorphonoclery leukocyte accumulation in acute cerebral infarction and their correlation with brain tissue damage[J]. Stroke, 1996, 27( 10): 1739-1743.
  • 6Tomita M, Fukuuchi Y. Leukocytes, macrophages and secondary brain damage following cerebral ischemia[ J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 1996,66: 32 - 39.
  • 7Akopov S E, Grigorian G S, Ovanessian G A. Deavtivation of NO by polymorphonuclear leukocyte in patients with ischemic cerebral infarction[J]. Stroke, 1996, 27(12): 2337-2338.
  • 8Lee K R, Colon G P, Betz A L, et al. Edema from intracerebral hemorrhage: the role of thrombin[J]. J Neurosurg, 1996, 84( 1 ): 91 -96.
  • 9Masada T, Xi G, Hua Y, et al. The effects of thrombin precinditioning Theeffects of thrombin preconditioning on focal cerebral ischemia in rats[J]. Brain Res, 2000, 867(1 -2): 173 -179.
  • 10Xi G, Keep R F, HoffJ T, et al. Erythrocytes and delayed brain edema formation following intracerebral hemorrhage in rats[ J]. J Neurosurg, 1998, 89(6): 991 -996.

共引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部