期刊文献+

电针对脑卒中后偏身麻木感的疗效观察 被引量:2

electro - acupuncture for treating unilateral anesthesia patients with stroke
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨电针对脑卒中后偏身麻木感的治疗效果。方法:42例脑卒中所致的偏身麻木感患者随机分为治疗组(21例)和对照组(21例)。治疗组接受电针和常规药物治疗,对照组仅接受常规药物治疗,参照NRS评定法和临床评定来评价疗效。结果:治疗前两组患者麻木感得分(8.60±0.59和8.59±0.67)差异无显著性(P〉0.05),通过治疗(治疗组平均治疗25.3次)后得分低至(1.86±0.45和7.52±0.31),两组得分比治疗前都有降低,但治疗组得分减少程度显著高于对照组,P〈0.001。临床疗效评定,治疗组有效19例,无效2例,有效率为90.5%,对照组有效7例,无效14例,有效率为33,3%,两组比较校正卡方统计量=12.216,双侧P=0.000〈0.001,差异有显著性。提示电针治疗在改善脑卒中后肢体麻木感方面具有显著的效果。结论:电针能显著改善脑卒中后偏身麻木感症状。 Objective To survey the effect of electro -acupuncture -treating on unilateral anesthesia patients with stroke. Methods Forty - two stroke patients were divided into 2 groups : electro - acupuncture - treating group( n = 21 ) were treated with electro - acupuncture and routine medication therapy ,control group( n = 21 )were treated with routine medication only. The patients were assessed with NRS test and clinical swallowing assessment. Results The first assessment score of NRS test in 2 groups were 8.60±0.59 and 8.59 ±0.67 ,respectively,after treatment the score were 1.86±0.45 and 7.52± 0.31 respectively, P 〈 0. 001. In clinical swallowing assessment, the efficiency were 90.5% and 33.3 % respeetively,P =0. 000 〈0. 001. Conclusion electro - acupuncture - treating training can improve the unilateral anesthesia patients.
作者 刘宏 杨和平
出处 《医学信息(下旬刊)》 2010年第3期131-132,共2页 Medical information
关键词 脑卒中 偏身麻木感 电针 stroke unilateral anesthesia electro - acupuncture
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1许健鹏,陈之罡,李惠兰.偏瘫康复的中康针刺法[J].中国康复理论与实践,2004,10(9):574-575. 被引量:18
  • 2刘忠博.牛痘疫苗致炎兔皮提取液—恩再适[J].齐鲁药事,2005,24(8):509-510. 被引量:14
  • 3[1]FISAHMAN B,PASTERNAK S,WALLENSTEIN SL,et al.The memorial pain assessment card[J].Cancer,1987,60:1151- 1158.
  • 4[2]RHIND VM,BIRD NA, WRIGHT V.A comparison of clinical assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis[J].Annals of the Rheumatic Disease,1980,39:135- 137.
  • 5[3]HUSKISSON EC,JONE J,SCOTT PJ.Application of visual analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity[J].Rheumatology and Rehabilitation,1976,15:185- 187.
  • 6[4]DOWNIE WW,LEATHAM PA,RHIND VM.Studies with pain rating scales[J].Annals of the Rheumatics Diseases,1978, 37: 378- 381.
  • 7[5]WILKIE D,LOVEJOY N,DODD M,et al.Cancer pain intensity measurement:concurrent validity of three tools- finger dynameter,pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale[J].Hospice Journal,1990, 6:1- 13.
  • 8[6]MARCHAND S,BUSHNELL MC,DUNCAN GH.Modulation of heat pa- in perception by high frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,1991,1: 122- 129.
  • 9[7]PRICE DD,BUSH FM,LONG S,et al.A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scale[J].Pain,1994, 56: 217- 226.
  • 10[8]JESEN MP,MCFARLAND CA.Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients[J].Pain,1993,55:195- 203.

共引文献471

同被引文献43

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部