期刊文献+

利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金葡菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎的比较 被引量:14

Comparison of Linezolid and Vancomycin in the Treatment of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Induced by MRSA
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价和比较利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗重症监护病房耐甲氧西林金葡菌(MRSA)所致呼吸机相关性肺炎的有效性及安全性。方法:采取随机、对照、开放的临床试验研究,选取重症监护病房确诊的MRSA所致呼吸机相关性肺炎患者54例。将入选患者随机分为2组,利奈唑胺组(24例),每次600mg,每隔12h一次,静脉滴注,治疗时间10d;万古霉素组(30例),每次500mg,每隔8h一次,静脉滴入,治疗时间10d。观察2组患者的疗效和不良反应。结果:利奈唑胺组有效率100%,MRSA清除率87.5%,不良反应率12.5%;万古霉素组有效率66.7%,MRSA清除率43.3%,不良反应率13.3%。2组有效率和MRSA清除率有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:对重症监护病房MRSA所致呼吸机相关性肺炎的治疗,利奈唑胺有效性优于万古霉素。 OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of linezolid vs. vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-inducing ventilator-associated pneumonia in ICU. METHODS: In randomized controlled trials, 54 patients with MRSA-inducing ventilator-associated pneumonia in ICU were randomly divided into 2 groups. Linezolid group (n=24) were administered with linezolid 600 mg every 12 h for 10 days, ivgtt. Vancomycin group (n=30) were given vancomycin 500 mg every 8h for 10 days ivgtt. Adverse events and the efficacy of two groups were investigated. RESULTS: Comparison results of linezolid group vs. vancomycin group were as follows: effective rates: 100% vs. 66.7%, MRSA eradication rates: 87.5% vs. 43.3%, adverse reactions rates: 12.5% vs. 13.3%. There were significant differences in the effective rates and MRSA eradication rates between two groups. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of linezolid in the treatment of MRSA-inducing ventilator-associated pneumonia is superior to vancomycin.
作者 朱爱江 徐磊
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第8期730-732,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 利奈唑胺 万古霉素 耐甲氧西林金葡菌肺炎 机械通气 Linezolid Vancomycin MRSA pneumonia Mechanical ventilation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献55

  • 1周竹超,倪泉兴,吴菊芳,章强强.普外科真菌感染84例临床调查[J].中国抗感染化疗杂志,2004,4(4):219-222. 被引量:11
  • 2徐晓峰,刘双,张艳艳,高伟,李京明.念珠菌菌血症22例临床分析[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(3):215-216. 被引量:7
  • 3Chastre J,Fagon JY. Ventilatorassociated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2002,165(7) :867.
  • 4Kollef MH, Rello J, Cammarata SK, et al. Clinical cure and survival in Gram - positi veventilator - associated pneumonia: Retrospective analysis of two double - blind studies comparing linezolid with vancomycin. Intensive Care Med,2004,30 (3) :388.
  • 5Rubinstein E, Cammarata SK, Oliphant TH, et al. Linezolid ( PNU- 100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: arandomized, double - blind,multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis,2001,32(3) :402.
  • 6Wunderink RG,Cammarata SK,Oliphant TH,et al. Continuation of a randomized, doubleblind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Clin Ther,2003,25 (3) :980.
  • 7Rello J,Torres A, Ricart M, et al. Ventilator - associated pneumonia by Staphylococcus aureus. Comparison of methicillin - resistant and methicillin - sensitive episodes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med ,1994,150(6 pt 1) :1545.
  • 8Cosgrove SE, Sakoulas G, Perencevich EN, et al. Comparison of mortalityassociated with methicillinresistant and methicillin - susceptible Staphylococcusaureus bacteremia: a meta - analysis. Clin Infect Dis,2003,36( 1 ) :53.
  • 9Melzer M,Eykyn S J, Gransden WR, et al. Is Methicillin - resistant Staphylococcusaureus more virulent than methicillin - susceptible S. aureus? Clin Infect Dis ,2003,37 ( 11 ): 1453.
  • 10Hiramatsu K, Aritaka N, Hanaki H, et al. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet, 1997,350(9092): 1670.

共引文献2198

同被引文献115

引证文献14

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部