期刊文献+

基于共同演化范式的代工企业GVC升级机理研究与代工策略启示——基于二元关系的视角 被引量:39

A Coevolution Analysis on OEM/ODMs GVC Upgrading Mechanism and Its Application to Strategies——Dyadic Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 GVC嵌入中的我国代工企业"升级"与"伪升级"命运迥然各异,其背后机理既有的理论缺乏解释,代工企业面临代工策略的决策困境。本文认为,二元关系的视角下代工企业的GVC升级命运,是代工能力建构与GVC知识治理共同演化的结果。基于共同演化范式,对多层次嵌入情境、初始条件、演化机理以及GVC"升级"或"伪升级"演化结果等进行了分析。结论认为,代工能力的专有性是"升级"演化的主要动力,其处于主导的条件下,适度进行关系专用性投资将起着助推"升级"的积极作用。但是,当代工能力处于专用性主导时,关系专用性投资将使代工企业进一步陷入"伪升级"泥潭。据此结论,为代工企业提出寻求GVC升级的相关代工策略与政策建议。 OEM/ODMs dramatically different upgrading or downgrading phenomena needs theoretical explanations. By the perspective of dyadic relation and update research conclusions of buyer-supplier governance, constructs co-evolution analysis framework in between OEM/ODM's capability and GVC knowledge governance. The knowledge logic is:OEM/ODM's capability exclusiveness and relational specificity, drive the dyadic relation orientation and power structure, and then on the one hand influence GVC knowledge transferring and spillover interface which screen and select specific or independent knowledge, on the other hand makes value distribution and OEM/ODM's upgrading destiny. The conclusion is that OEM/ODM's capability's structure of exclusiveness and relational specificity is the key of upgrading or downgrading evolution approaches. But downgrading can shift to upgrading evolution approach by construction effort. The author as the end, puts forward some practical suggestions.
作者 俞荣建
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期16-25,共10页 China Industrial Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学基金项目"价值权力争夺视角下我国领先OEM企业自主价值体系构建研究"(批准号087JC630080) 浙江省自然科学基金一般项目"基于GVC治理的浙江代工企业GVC升级机理研究"(批准号Y6090142) 浙江省哲学社会科学规划办公室"长江三角洲地区加快制度合作 推进共同发展研究系列"研究项目"GVC升级视角下长三角国际代工产业自主价值体系构建研究"(批准号09HZCS01Z)
关键词 GVC升级 代工能力 GVC知识治理 二元关系 GVC upgrading OEM/ODM capabilities GVC knowledge governance dyadic relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Williamson, O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting [M]. New York:Free Press, 1985.
  • 2Ernst D. Inter-organizational Knowledge Outsoureing: What Permits Small Taiwan Residents Firms to Compete in the Computer Industry[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2000, 17(2).
  • 3Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. The Governance of Global Value Chains[J]. Review of International Political Economy,2005,12(1).
  • 4Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, Gary. The Core Competence of the Corporation [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990, (May, June ).
  • 5Dyer, Jeffrey H., P. Kale, and H. Singh. Splitting the Pie: Rent Distribution in Alliances and Networks[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics,2008, (3).
  • 6Heide, Jan B. Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels[J]. Journal of Marketing,1994,58(1).
  • 7Tokatli. Nebahat Asymmetrical Power Relalions and Upgrading Among Suppliers of Global Clothing Brands[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2007,7 (1).
  • 8Arnt Buvika, Torger Reve. Inter-firm Governance and Structural Power in Industrial Relationships:The Moderating Effect of Bargaining Power on the Contractual Safeguarding of Specific Assets [R]. Stand. J. Mgmt, 2002.
  • 9Shervani T.A., Frazier G., Challagalla G. The Moderating Influence of Firm Market Power on the Transaction Cost Economics Model: An Empirical Test in a Forward Channel Integration Context [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, (28).
  • 10Lewin, A. Y., H. W. Volberda. Prolegomena on Co-evolution:A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms[J]. Organization Science, 1999, (5).

二级参考文献63

同被引文献558

引证文献39

二级引证文献315

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部