期刊文献+

海权、陆权与大战略——地理政治学的大战略内涵 被引量:8

Sea Power,Land Power and Grand Strategy:The Grand Strategic Implications of Geopolitics
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为思考和判断地理因素的社会作用的一种理论形式,地理政治学与大战略研究之间一直存在密切联系,本文的目的是对地理政治学的大战略内涵进行系统地总结和梳理。文章指出,作为一种大战略思想形态,地理政治学主要有两大思想流派,即拉采尔首创的"有机国家论"以及马汉、麦金德和斯皮克曼代表的"地理战略论"。本文认为,作为盎格鲁-撒克逊民族对外政策关切的体现,"地理战略论"的关注焦点主要有两个问题:一是工业革命引发的技术进步对海权与陆权间力量对比的潜在涵义;二是主导性海洋国家为应对这种局面应采取的手段。尽管海权与陆权间力量对比历来是"地理战略论"的关注重点,但位于两者之间的"边缘地带"在这派理论中同样也占有重要地位,本文最后专门考察了"边缘地带"的大战略意义。 Geopolitics,as a theory by which to judge the social effects of the geographical structure, has long been connected with the study of Grand Strategy. This paper intends to systematically sort out and analyze the grand strategic implications of Geopolitics. The author contends that as one of the theoretical forms of grand strategy, Geopolitics could be roughly divided into two branches, namely Ratzel’s Organic State Theory and the Geostrategy represented by Mahan, Mackinder and Spykman. The author argues that as an embodiment of the Anglo-Saxon foreign policy concerns, Geostrategy focuses mainly on two issues. The one is about the impacts of technological advances brought about by the industrial revolution on the equilibrium between sea power and land power and the other about what the leading maritime powers should do with this situation. Although the changing equilibrium between sea power and land power has traditionally been the focus of Geostrategy, the rimland as well occupies a very important place in this legendary school of geopolitical ideas. In view of this, the author specifically makes an analysis of the strategic implications of the rimland in this article.
作者 吴征宇
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期52-66,共15页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金 中国人民大学985项目资金资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1Gearoid O" Tuathail, "Putting Mackinder in His Place", Political Geography, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1992, p. 115.
  • 2Donald W. Meinig, "Heartland and Rimland in Eurasian History", Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1956, p.556.
  • 3[英]杰弗里·帕克.《二十世纪西方地理政治思想》,李亦鸣、徐小杰、张荣忠译,北京:解放军出版社1992年版,“中译序”.
  • 4Oyvind Osterud, "The Uses and Abuses of Geopolitics", Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1988, p. 192.
  • 5Geoffrey Sloan, Geopolitics in United States Strategic Policy 1890-1987, Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books, 1988, p. 58.
  • 6Martin I. Glassner and Harm J. de Blij, Systemic Political Geography, New York: Wiley and Sons, 1950, p. 267.
  • 7Geoffrey Parker, Western Geopolitical Thought in the Twentieth Century, London: Croom Helm, 1985, p. 89.
  • 8Geoffrey Parker, Geopolitics: Past, Present and Future, London: Pinter, 1998, p.20.
  • 9Albert Wohlstetter, "Illusions of Distance", Foreign Affairs, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1968, p. 243.
  • 10Harold Sprout, "Geopolitical Hypotheses in Technological Perspective", World Politics, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1963, p. 194.

二级参考文献41

  • 1吴征宇.兰克VS.德约:均势现实主义与霸权现实主义[J].欧洲研究,2007,25(2):21-32. 被引量:11
  • 2Christopher Layne, The Peace of Illusions, Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2006, p. 19.
  • 3Robert J. Art, A Grand Strategy for America, Ithaca: Comell University Press, 2003, p. 176.
  • 4Christopher Layne, The Peace of llluzions, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006, p. 37.
  • 5Brian Rathbun, "A Rose by Any Other Name," Security Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2008, p. 296.
  • 6John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2001, p.40.
  • 7George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1987, p. 220.
  • 8Mark R. Brawley, Liberal Leadership, Ithaca: Comell University Press, 1993, p. 2.
  • 9M. C. Webb and S. D. Krasner, "Hegemonic Stability Theory," Review oflnternatlonal Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1989,p. 190.
  • 10Karen A. Rasler and William R. Thompson, The Great Powers and Global Struggle 1490 - 1990, Lexington, Kentucky : The University Press of Kentucky, 1994, p. 124.

共引文献9

同被引文献139

引证文献8

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部