期刊文献+

烤烟品种K326突变株抗烟草普通花叶病(TMV)的研究初报 被引量:2

Preliminary study on TMV resistance in K326 mutant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过2006~2008年的田间试验,进行了烤烟惦种K326突变株CQY材料对烟草普通花叶瘸(TMV)抗性研究。结果表明:接种TMV后第7dK326、CQY和Coker176心叶表现系统斑驳的发病率分别为99.10%、42.54%和1.18%;接种TMV后第14d和第21d,CQY和Coker176发病率与第7d相比略有增加,K326发病率为100%,方差分析表明3个处理间差异极显著(P〈0.01)。CQY没有表现系统斑驳的烟株在接种叶片部位表现过敏性坏死斑,症状与Coker176的过敏性坏死斑相似。CQY病情指数从第7d的10,64快速发展到笫14d的35.11,最后到第21d的39.63,方差分析结果显示,接种TMV后第7d、第14d和第21dK326、CQY和Coker1763个处理间的病情指数差异均为极显著(P〈O.01)。农艺性状测量结果表明,CQY材料与K326在株高、叶片数、茎嘲、节距等差异不显著,CQY材料较K326叶片变短变宽;产量产值与K326差异不显著(P〉0.05)。 TMV resistance of a K326 mutant was investigated by field experiment in 2006 - 2008. Results showed that TMV incidence after 7 days inoculation in K326, CQY, and Coker176 was 99.10%, 42.54%, and 1.18%, respectively. TMV incidence in CQY and Coker176 on dayl4 and 21 was slightly higher than that at day7, and that of K326 was 100%. Significant difference (P 〈 0.01) in incidence was found among K326, CQY, and Coker176. In inoculation position, CQY without mosaic symptom caused necrotic spots witch were similar to those of Coker176. Disease index of CQY increased from 10.64 to 35.11 at the initial stage (7-14), and was 39.63 on day 21. Significant differences (P 〈 0.01) were found in disease index among K326, CQY, and Coker176, on day 7, 14, and 21. It indicated that agronomic traits including plant height, number of leaves, stem girth, and node distance had no significant differences between K326 and CQY. Leaf of CQY was significantly shorter and wider than that of K326. Results of multiple comparison showed no significant (Ip 〉 0.05) difference in yield and production value between K326 and CQY.
出处 《中国烟草学报》 EI CAS CSCD 2010年第1期58-62,共5页 Acta Tabacaria Sinica
基金 贵州省烟草公司资助[黔烟科(2004)14]
关键词 烤烟 烟草普通花叶病 突变株 抗性 flue-cured tobacco TMV mutant resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献21

共引文献116

同被引文献26

  • 1许美玲,赵立红,段玉琪,杨彦明,李德团,张红梅.抗TMV烟草种质资源材料的筛选和综合评价[J].中国烟草学报,2005,11(1):29-31. 被引量:18
  • 2彭华伟,刘国顺,朱贵川,符德龙,陈秀娥.生物有机肥对烤烟烟碱累积的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2006,34(B07):50-52. 被引量:17
  • 3钱益新.植物源农药的现状和发展[J].农化新世纪,2007(6):11-15. 被引量:3
  • 4中国农业科学院烟草研究所.中国烟草栽培学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005.55.
  • 5姜成康.国家局(总公司)局长(总经理)办公会议[C].北京,2011-02-12.
  • 6Marathe R,Anandalakshmi R,Liu Y L,et al. The tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene,N [ J]. Plant Pathol, 2002,3 ( 3 ) : 167-172.
  • 7Holmes F O. Inheritance of resistance to tobacco mosaic disease in tobacco [ J]. Phytopathology, 1935,28:553-561.
  • 8Whitham S,Dinesh-Kumar S P, Choi D, et al. The product of the tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N: similarity to toll and the interleu kin -1 receptor [ J ]. C ell, 1994,78 : 1101 -1115.
  • 9Holmes F O. Control of TMV in tobaccos [ J ]. Phytopathology, 1955,45:224-225.
  • 10Reona T, Shigemi S, Ichiro M, et al. Accumulation of the two tran- scripts of the N gene, conferring resistance to tobacco mosaic vi- rus, is probably important for N Gene-dependcnt hypersensitive cell death [J]. Plant Cell Physiol,2006,47(2) :254-261.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部