期刊文献+

从法国“新小说”看后现代主义的悖论 被引量:1

Analysis of Paradox in Post-modernism through French "New Novel"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 后现代主义迷失在否认定义的文字盘旋之中,已经掉入了定义的陷阱;"新小说"坚信世界和人生毫无意义,这种认知本身就是有意义的,尤其当它用文字表达出来的时候;"新小说"反对阐释,拒斥合理的故事情节,而读者受传统阅读心理的制约,阅读时会自动赋予"新小说"以意义和情节的完整性。 While post-modernists lost themselves in entangling with words of denying definition, they have already fallen into a trap of trying to give a definition. Writers of "New Novel" convinced that the world and life were meaningless. In fact, this conception itself is meaningful, especially when it is expressed in writing. Writers of "New Novel" were against interpretation and rejected arranging reasonable plots in their novels. But readers, who are influenced by traditional reading psychology, do automatically give "New Novel" meanings and complete plots in reading process .
作者 陈婷婷
出处 《温州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第2期84-88,共5页 Journal of Wenzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 “新小说” 后现代主义 悖论 定义 意义 阐释 "New Novel" Post-modernism Paradox Definition Significance Interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1乔治·瑞泽尔.后现代社会理论[M].谢立中,译.北京:华夏出版社,2002.
  • 2迈克·费瑟斯通.消费文化与后现代主义[M].南京:译林出版社,2000..
  • 3史蒂文·康纳.后现代主义文化:当代理论导引[M].严忠志,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
  • 4波兹曼.娱乐至死[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.
  • 5Baudrillard J. The Consumer Society [M]. London: Verso Books, 1998: 188.
  • 6丹尼斯·史密斯 萧韶译.后现代性的预言家:齐格蒙特·鲍曼传[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2002.180-181.
  • 7罗歇·米歇尔·阿勒芒.阿兰·罗伯·格里耶[M].苏文平,刘苓,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2004:4.

共引文献163

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部