中美司法规则的比较及鉴戒

A Comparison between the Judicial Rules of Chinese Law and Anglo-American Law

中国司法的基本原则是依法判案,或者依赖最高法院司法解释。当成文法规定滞后时法官对新型案件常常无所适从,因社会变化引发的矛盾冲突尽管可以通过司法解释的不断推出得以缓解,但并不能从根本上解决问题。通过中美司法规则的比较,对中国在法律制定与修订、案例的编辑出版、高等法学教育等方面,都能起到鉴戒作用。

The basic principle of Chinese administration of justice ing to law or depending on judicial interpretations of the Supreme who rely on written law heavily can do nothing about new cases is making adjudication accord- People＇s Court. Chinese judges when the written law lags be- hind. Although enacting judicial interpretations can moderate the contradictions between the written law provisions and social changes, the problem cannot be thoroughly solved. The judicial rules of Anglo - American law and Chinese law are compared and proposals are put forward re- garding the formulation and revision of law, the publication of cases, the higher education of ju- risprudence, etc.