期刊文献+

基于E_DAG的本体不一致性诊断算法研究

Ontology inconsistent diagnosis algorithm on E_DAG
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本体不一致性问题是语义网络研究中的关键技术之一。基于DAG图的局部诊断方法在传统的模型诊断基础上,采用经典逻辑进行描述,这种方法在构造性知识描述领域中得到大量应用。无辜诊断方法对局部诊断方法进行了改进,可进一步提高局部诊断方法的求解效率。在此基础上,对DAG图表示进行了扩展,提出了一种基于E_DAG的本体不一致性处理的表示方法及其相应实现算法,并通过动物本体实例说明了此方法的工作原理。 Ontology inconsistent problem is one of the key technologies on semantic web.Based on model diagnosis,local diagnosis technology algorithm on E_DAG decribed with classical logic has been widely used in the domain of constructive knowledge description.Innocent diagnosis has improved local diagnosis to obtain more effective result.On the basis of innocent diagnosis,this paper presents an E_DAG representation and its corresponding algorithm,which extends DAG to solve ontology inconsistent problem.An animal ontology example is given to demonstrate the working principle of the E_DAG diagnosis algorithm.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期19-22,共4页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)(No.2007CB307100 No.2007CB307106) 国家高等教育博士项目特殊研究基金(No.20050004008)~~
关键词 本体不一致性 模型诊断 局部诊断 无辜诊断 E_DAG ontology inconsistent model diagnosis local diagnosis innocent diagnosis E_DAG
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Huang Zhi-sheng,van Harmelen F,ten Teijed A.Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies[C]//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,2005:454-459.
  • 2Schlobach S.Debugging and semantic clarification by pinpointing[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference, 2005 : 226-240.
  • 3Schlobach S,Cornet R.Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies[C]//Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,2003:355- 362.
  • 4Stefan S,Huang Zhi-sheng.Inconsistent ontology diagnosis and repair,Project Report D3.6.3[R].SEKT,2007.
  • 5Wang Hai,Horridge M,Rector A,et al.Debugging 0WL-DL ontologies:A heuristic approach[C]//4th International Semantic Web Conference, 2005 : 745-757.
  • 6Lam J S C.Methods for resolving inconsistencies in ontologies[D]. University of Aberdeen, 2007.
  • 7Huang Zhi-sheng,van Harmelen F.Using semantic distances for reasoning with inconsistent ontologies[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Semantic Web Conference , 2008 :178-194.
  • 8Hansson S O.Semi-revision[J]Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic, 1997,7:151-175.
  • 9Hansson S O,Wasserman R.Local change[R].Institute for Logic,Language and Computation, 1999.
  • 10李冬梅,林友芳,黄厚宽.本体不一致性处理中的无辜诊断方法[J].北京交通大学学报,2009,33(5):81-84. 被引量:1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Thomas R, Gruber. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications [ J ]. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 5(2) : 199 - 220.
  • 2Huang Zhisheng, Harmelen Frank van, Teijed Annette ten. Reasoning with Inconsistent Ontologies [ C ]// Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2005 : 454 - 459.
  • 3Schlobach S. Debugging and Semantic Clarification By Pinpointing[ C]/// Proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference, 2005: 226- 240.
  • 4Schlobach Stefan, Huang Zhisheng. Inconsistent Ontology Diagnosis and Repair[ R]. Project Report D3.6.3, SEKT, 2007.
  • 5Wang Hai, Horridge Matthew, Recto, et al. Debugging OWL-DL Ontologies: A Heuristic Approach[C]//4th International Semantic Web Conference, 2005:745- 757.
  • 6Joey Sik Chun Lam. Methods for Resolving Inconsistencies in Ontologies[ D]. University of Aberdeen, 2007.
  • 7Hansson S O. Semi-Revision[J]. Journal of Applied Non- Classical Logic, 1997(7) : 151 - 175.
  • 8Hansson S O, Wasserman R. Local change[R]. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, 1999.
  • 9Reiter R A. Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1987, 32(1): 57-95.
  • 10Hamscher W, Console L, Kleer J. de. Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis[M]. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. CA, USA, 1992.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部