期刊文献+

习凿齿与王夫之的三国正统论比较 被引量:1

A Comparative Study of Xi Zuochi and Wang Fuzhi's Orthodoxy of The Three Kingdoms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 正统论是中国古代政治史和史学史中频繁遇到的问题,许多史学家在撰述历史时都要花费笔墨去论证王朝来源的合法性、合理性。习凿齿和王夫之在分析三国及以后的历史时,处于不同的时代,站在不同的立场和角度撰写专文讨论正统论,在历史上都有很大的影响。分析二人正统论的异同,对于我们正确看待古代正统论的核心问题、主要观点及其流变有一定的意义。 In the ancient Chinese politics history and historiography, the orthodox theory prevailed and many ancient Chinese historians expounded and proved the legitimacy and the reasonability of Chinese dynasties with enthusiastic efforts when they wrote their histories. In analyzing the history of and/or after the Three Kingdoms, both Xi Zuochi and Wang Fuzhi, standing on different ground, wrote their essays on this subject, and their opinions have a great influence in Chinese history. It is of significance to analyze the similarities and differences between their opinions about orthodox theory so as to get the essence and development of the orthodox theory.
作者 刘治立
机构地区 陇东学院历史系
出处 《成都大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第2期110-113,共4页 Journal of Chengdu University (Social Sciences)
关键词 习凿齿 王夫之 三国正统论 Xi - Zuochi Wang - Fuzhi orthodoxy of the Three Kingdoms
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1黎靖德.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1994..
  • 2顾炎武.日知录[M].上海:上海商务印书馆,1934.
  • 3刘知畿.史通[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978.
  • 4梁启超.饮冰室文集全编[M].上海:上海新民书局,1931.
  • 5萧蓬父,许苏民.王夫之评传[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2002.

共引文献114

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部