期刊文献+

两种免疫抑制剂对肾移植受者外周血象及红细胞生成素的影响

Influence of two immunosuppression regimens on peripheral blood parameters and erythropoietin of kidney transplantation recipients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨两种免疫抑制治疗方案对肾移植受者外周血象及红细胞生成素(EPO)的影响。方法按免疫抑制方案的不同,将肾移植受者分为雷帕霉素(RAP)方案组(28例)和他克莫司(FK506)方案组(44例)。在两组肾移植受者随访时采集外周血,检测血常规指标、网织红细胞指标、血清EPO和血清肌酐(Cr)。比较并分析两方案肾移植受者各项指标间的差异。结果RAP方案组外周白细胞、红细胞、血小板数和血红蛋白含量较FK506方案组显著降低(P<0.01),EPO则明显升高(P<0.01)。两组间网织红细胞和血清Cr无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论以RAP为主的免疫抑制治疗方案对肾移植受者的骨髓抑制明显,外周血象影响较大,EPO出现代偿性升高。 Objective To investigate the effect on peripheral blood parameters and erythropoietin (EPO) of renal transplantation patients with different treatment of new immunosuppressive agents. Methods According to different immunosuppressive regimens, recipients were divided into rapamycin (RAP) group (28 cases) and taerolimus (FKS06) group (44 cases). During follow-up of the recipients, peripheral blood parameters, reticulocyte parameters, serum EPO level and serum creatinine were measured and analyzed. Results RBC, WBC, PLT and HGB of RAP group were significantly lower than that of FK506 group ( P 〈 0.01 ). RAP group has higher level of EPO concentration( P 〈 0.01 ), but RET and Cr are no significant different from FK506 group( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion RAP based immunosuppressiou regimen has bone marrow depressive effect and obviously influences the peripheral blood parameters. High level EPO was compensatory response.
出处 《药学实践杂志》 CAS 2010年第1期32-33,72,共3页 Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice
关键词 肾移植 雷帕霉素 他克莫司 血细胞 红细胞生成素 renal transplantation rapamycin tacrolimus blood cells erythropoietin
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献65

  • 1彭隽,兰天飙,车华,余爱荣.ARB和ACEI维持性血液透析患者EPO疗效比较[J].药物流行病学杂志,2006,15(1):8-10. 被引量:4
  • 2程东瑞,孙启全.肾移植术后贫血的发病机制和治疗[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2007,16(2):187-191. 被引量:2
  • 3Stepkowski SM, Chen H, Daloze P, et al. Rapamycin, a potent immunosuppressive drug for vascularized heart, kidney, and small bowel transplantation in the rat [J]. Transplantation, 1991, 51(1):22-26.
  • 4Granger DK, Cromwell JW, Chen SC, et al. Prolongation of renal allograft survival in a large animal model by oral rapamycin monotherapy[J]. Transplantation, 1995, 59(2):183- 186.
  • 5Abraham RT, Wiederrecht GJ. Immunopharmacology of rapamycin[J]. Annu Rev Immunol, 1996, 14:483 - 510.
  • 6Grinyo JM. Progress with cyclosporine-sparing regimens[J].Transplant Proc, 1999, 31(Suppl 8A): 11S- 16S.
  • 7Mourad G, Vela C, Ribstein J, et al. Long-term improvement in renal function after cyclosporine reduction in renal transplant recipients with histologically proven chronic cyclosporine nephropathy[J]. Transplantation, 1998, 65(5):661 -667.
  • 8Weir MR, Anderson L, Fink JC, et al. A novel approach to the treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy[J]. Transplantation, 1997, 64(12): 1706 - 1710.
  • 9Hueso M, Bover J, Seron D, et al. Low-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients with suboptimal renal function [J]. Transplantation, 1998, 66(12): 1727 - 1731.
  • 10Marx SO, Jayaraman T, Go LO, et al. Rapamycin-FKBP inhibits cell cycle regulators of proliferation in vascular smoothmusclecells[J]. Circ Res, 1995, 76(3):412-417.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部