期刊文献+

信息技术采用对关系治理的影响:投入专用性的调节效应研究 被引量:3

Information Technology and Relational Governance:The Moderating Effect of Special Investment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着信息技术在供应链中的广泛应用,企业间的竞争合作已成为供应链成员生存和发展的战略选择,供应链合作伙伴关系治理越来越重要,制造商和供应商通过联合行动共同应付投入专用性等带来的问题,从而促进双方的合作。文章在分析和总结前人研究成果基础上,重点探讨信息技术采用对企业间关系治理的影响,以及在企业信息化过程中投入专用性和信任的调节作用,并运用来自海峡西岸经济区制造商和供应商的调研数据,利用基于调节效应的结构方程模型进行实证研究表明,在联合行动过程中,信任的调节作用显著,在事前的联合计划阶段,投入专用性的调节作用显著,而在后期的联合解决问题阶段,投入专用性的调节作用并不显著,为企业在信息系统采用过程中处理各种资产的专用性投入提供一些理论上的借鉴和实践上的启示。 With the development of information technology, competition and cooperation have become the strategic choices of enterprise sustainable survival and development, and relational governance has become more important. Manufacturer and supplier take joint action to deal with the problems of special investment, in order to effectively improve cooperation relationship. Based on previous studies, this paper makes an explorative study of the effect of information technology on inter-firm relational governance, and the moderating effect of special investment and trust during enterprise informatization. With the support of information technology, special investment and trust both are important influencing factors to inter-firm relationship, the theory model of direct and indirect influence of these factors to relational governance during enterprise the process of informatization. Transaction-specific information technology (IT) investments are those investments intended to support a specific manufacturer-supplier relationship. The presence of trust and reciprocal investments have been described as important antecedents to inter-firm electronic cooperation. Electronic cooperation in interorganizational relationship has been generally explained as a function of IOS, and IS (Information System) literature has called this IOS-induced cooperation as electronic integration, electronic interdependence, information partnership, or relational governance. The model emphasizes different role of these factors in different stage of joint action, and make further research on relational governance in support of information technology. The variables are measured against measurement standards, and by applying the data collected from 281 effective interviews, the theory model is empirically verified in both aspects of the dynamic process of joint action: joint planning and joint problem solving. With evidence from manufacturers and suppliers of economic zone in the west coast of Taiwan Strait, the empirical results based on SEM show that the moderating effect of trust is significant in joint action, the moderating effect of special investment is significant during prior joint planning, but not significant during post joint problem solving, which can give some inspiration on building special information system.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期125-133,145,共10页 Nankai Business Review
基金 世纪优秀人才支持计划(0000-X07173) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70902041) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(08JC630072)资助
关键词 信息技术 联合行动 投入专用性 调节效应 Information Technology Joint Action Special Investment Moderating Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Bensaou M.. Interorganizational Cooperation: The Role of Information Technology: An Empirical Comparison of US and Japanese Supplier Relations. Information Systems Research, 1997, 8(2): 107-124.
  • 2Vijayasarathy L. R., Bobey D.. The Effect of EDI on Marketing Channel Relationships in Retailing. Information & Management, 1997, 33(2): 73-86.
  • 3Malone T. W., Yates J., Benjamin R. I.. Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies. Communication of the ACM, 1987, 30: 484-497.
  • 4Leek S., Turnbull P. W., Naude P.. How is Information Technology Affecting Business Relationships? Results from a UK Survey. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003, 32:119-126.
  • 5Argyres N. S.. The Impact of Information Technology on Coordination Evidence from the B-2 "Stealth" Bomber, Organization Science, 1999, 10(2): 162-180.
  • 6Pires G. D., Aisbett J.. The Relationship between Technology Adoption and Strategy in Business-to-business Markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003, 32: 291-300.
  • 7Mohr J., Nevin R.. Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Throretical Perspective. Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54(4): 36-51.
  • 8Walton S. V., Marucheck A. S.. The Relationship between EDI and Supplier Reliability. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1997, 33(3): 30-35.
  • 9Mohr J., Spekman R.. Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behaviour and Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15: 135-152.
  • 10Pulkkinen M., Naumenko A., Luostarinen K.. Managing Information Security in a Business Network of Machinery Maintenance Services Business-enterprise Architecture as a Coordination Tool. The Journal of Systems and Software, 2007, 80: 1607-1620.

二级参考文献31

  • 1徐宏玲,李双海.价值链形态演变与模块化组织协调[J].中国工业经济,2005(11):81-88. 被引量:37
  • 2T.K.Das,and Bing-Sheng Teng.Between Trust and Control:Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances[J].Academy of Management Review,1998,23(3).
  • 3Angela Hausman.Variations in Relationship Strength and Its Impact on Performance and Satisfaction Business Relationships[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2001,16(7).
  • 4Candace Jones,William S.Hesterly,and Stephen P.Borgatti.A General Theory of Network Governance:Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms[J].Academy of Management Review,1997,22(4).
  • 5Gary Hamel.Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal,Summer Special Issue,1991,12(SI).
  • 6Paul S.Adler.Market,Hierarchy,and Trust:The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism[J].Organization Science,2001,12(2).
  • 7James D.Westphal.Collaboration in the Boardroom:Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO Board Social Ties[J].The Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(1).
  • 8Bharat N.Anand,and Tarun Khanna.Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21 (3).
  • 9Daniel A.Wren.Interface and Interorganizational Coordination[J].Academy of Management Journal,1967,10(1).
  • 10Jan B.Heide,and George John.Alliances in Industrial Purchasing:The Determinants of Joint Action in BuyerSupplier Relationships[J].Journal of Marketing Research,1990,27(1).

共引文献308

同被引文献35

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7788
  • 2温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰.有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):448-452. 被引量:749
  • 3蔡淑琴,梁静.供应链协同与信息共享的关联研究[J].管理学报,2007,4(2):157-162. 被引量:56
  • 4罗秋菊.参展商参展决策研究——以东莞展览会为例[J].旅游学刊,2007,22(5):85-90. 被引量:33
  • 5Dickinson J R. Firms with large market shares, product lines, rate shows highly [J]. Marketing News, 1985, (5) : 14.
  • 6Hara B S, Herbig P A. Trade shows: What do the exhibitors think [ J]. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 1993, 8 (4) : 18 -25.
  • 7Berne C, Garcia-Ueeda M E. Criteria involved in evaluation of trade shows to visit [ J ]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2008, 37(5) :565 -579.
  • 8Breiter D, Milman A. Attendees' needs and service priorities in a large convention center: Application of the importance- performance theory [ J ]. Tourism Management, 2006, 27 (6) : 1364 - 1370.
  • 9Zhang H, Leung V. A refined model of factors affecting convention participation decision-making [ J 1. Tourism Management, 2007, 28 (4) : 1123 - 1127.
  • 10Cox J M, Sequeira I K, Bock L L. Trade shows trends. Audience quality remains high [ J]. Business Marketing, 1986, (5) :108 -114.

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部