期刊文献+

避讳怪象——“父子不嫌同名”新解

A New Interpretation about the Strange Phenomenon in Bihui: "Father and Son do not Care Using the Same Name"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 纵观古代历史,自周代起,避讳之风贯穿了我国封建社会两千多年。魏晋南北朝时期有关避讳的制度更严于前朝,然而此时却出现了"父子不嫌同名"的矛盾现象。陈寅恪和万绳楠先生皆认为此现象的产生为信道所致。本文通过先假设、再论证的方式,说明信道与"父子不嫌同名"没有必然关联,进而指出其现象存在的可能原因,并以此说明在历史研究中注意避讳学知识的重要性。 Throughout ancient history, since the Zhou Dynasty, the custom of Bihui exists for over two thousand years in China's feudal society. In Northern and Southern Dynasties, the system of Bihui is more strict than in the past dynasties. However, at this time, there exists a paradox about "father and son do not care using the same name". Mr. Chen Yin-ke and Mr. Wan Sheng-nan both believe that the emergence of this phenomenon stems from the Taoist faith. This paper first makes an assumption, then analyzes that "fa- ther and son do not care using the same name" is not necessarily related with the Taoism faith, further it points out the possible reasons for this phenomenon, and illustrates the importance of the knowledge of Bihui in historical research.
作者 汪婕
出处 《安徽广播电视大学学报》 2010年第1期103-106,共4页 Journal of Anhui Radio & TV University
关键词 避讳 魏晋南北朝 父子不嫌同名 Bihui Northern and Southern Dynasties father and son do not care using the same name
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1孔颖达.春秋左传正义·卷第二[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990:31.
  • 2郑玄注.礼记·卷第三[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:107.
  • 3周密.齐东野语[M].北京:中华书局,1983..
  • 4颜之推.颜氏家训译注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1999:49.
  • 5李延寿.南史·卷六十·列传第五十[M].北京:中华书局,2000:669.
  • 6陈垣.史讳举例[M].北京:中华书局,2006.
  • 7陈寅恪.金明馆从稿初编[M].北京:北京三联书店,2001:9.
  • 8王松年.仙苑编珠·卷中[O].明正统道藏本:15.
  • 9李百药.北齐书·卷二十四传十六·杜粥传[M].北京:中华书局,1972:348.
  • 10王溥.唐会要·卷二十三·讳[M].北京:中华书局,1955:322.

共引文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部