宇野理论与广松涉的价值概念

Uno's Theory and Hiromatsu's Concept of Value

"价值本身"的阐明,在马克思那里是以与"价值实体论"相混合的形式而展开的,后来的多数马克思学派也继承了这一缺陷。与此相对,作为有别于眼下"价值实体论"而阐明"价值本身"的性质的尝试,是日本的两位研究者即宇野弘藏和广松涉的研究。宇野认为:论证劳动价值说(及剩余价值论)即,《资本论》应该不是开头,而是第三篇"绝对剩余价值的生产"之后才展开"价值实体论",第一篇、第二篇则是与作为"流通形式论"(商品、货币、资本这种"价值本身"的存在方式的分析)。而广松认为":价值"不是单以物理的存在为出发点,而是主体间性地形成的"既不是主观的判断也不是客观的实在的东西"。

Kouzou Uno and Watru Hiromtsu caused the particular interpretation about the concept of ＂value＂. They denied the vulgar interpretation which insisted that the value is a physical existence, and made a distinctoin between value itself and substance of value. But Hiromtsu＇s thought is imperfect, especially his value formation theory.