期刊文献+

企业社会责任报告评价体系的初步研究 被引量:15

A Preliminary Study on the Appraisal System of Corporate Social Responsibility Report
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前国外对企业社会责任报告的评价模式有两个理论基础:利益相关者理论和可持续发展理论。前者着眼于企业的不同利益相关者对信息的需求,从外部对企业的社会责任报告进行评价;后者则着眼于企业战略,从企业可持续发展的角度评价企业社会责任报告,是从内部进行评价的模式。与此对应的具有代表性的两个国际标准是AA1000与G3。对比分析发现,这两种模式和两个标准各自都存在着优缺点。结合我国的实际状况,我们构建了企业社会责任报告的3R评价体系。该体系的建立将有助于我国企业社会责任报告准则的建立,并为企业社会责任信息质量的实证研究提供可行的框架。 The appraisal patterns of corporate social responsibility (CSR) report are based on stake- holder theory and sustainable development theory. The former theory focuses on the information needs of stakeholders, and the appraisal of CSR report is made from outside. The latter theory focuses on corporate strategy to appraise CSR report from the perspective of corporate sustainable development. It is a pattern from internal perspective. Accordingly, AAIO00 and G3 are the two representative international standards. By comparative analysis, we find that both the two patterns and standards have merits and faults. Consider- ing the status of China, we construct a 3R appraisal system of CSR report. This system does benefit to the establishment of CSR report standards, and provides the feasible frame for the empirical research on information quality of corporate social responsibility.
出处 《上海立信会计学院学报》 北大核心 2010年第1期54-60,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Lixin University of Commerce
基金 上海市教育委员会重点学科建设项目(J51701) 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(09ZS205)
关键词 社会责任报告 可持续发展理论 利益相关者理论 3R评价体系 corporate social responsibility report sustainable development theory stakeholder theory 3 R appraisal system
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1大趋势:企业社会责任报告国际动态[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(8):38-40. 被引量:4
  • 2Abbott Walter F. and Monsen, R. Joseph. On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self - Reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1979,22(3) :501 - 515.
  • 3陈政.上市公司社会责任报告解读与完善建议[J].证券市场导报,2007(8):28-33. 被引量:33
  • 4迈克尔·波特.战略与社会:竞争优势与企业社会责任之关系.哈佛商业评论,2006,(12).
  • 5Global Reporting Initiative. Sustainability Reporting Guideline [ R], www. globalreporting. org,2002.
  • 6AA1000 Assurance Standards[ EB/OL]. www. accountability.org. uk/resources, 2003.
  • 7AA1000 Assurance Standards[ EB/OL]. www. accountability.org. uk/resources, 2008.
  • 8AA1000鉴证标准中“相关准则”的说明.

二级参考文献15

  • 1沈洪涛,金婷婷.我国上市公司社会责任信息披露的现状分析[J].审计与经济研究,2006,21(3):84-87. 被引量:146
  • 2马连福,赵颖.上市公司社会责任信息披露影响因素研究[J].证券市场导报,2007(3):4-9. 被引量:141
  • 3沈洪涛.公司特征与公司社会责任信息披露——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].会计研究,2007(3):9-16. 被引量:484
  • 4Archie B Carroll,2000.A Commentary and An Overview of Key Questions on Corporate Social Performance[J].Business and Society,39:466-478.
  • 5Blacconiere,W.,Patten,D.,1994.Environmental Disclosures,Regulatory Costs,and Changes in Firm Value[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,18:357-377.
  • 6Bowman,E.H.,and Haire,M.,1975.A Strategic Posture Toward Corporate Social Responsibility[J].California Management Review,18:49-58.
  • 7Coffey,Betty S.,Fryxell,Gerald E.,1991.Institutional Ownership of Stock and Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance:An Empirical Examination[J].Journal of Business Ethics,10:437-444.
  • 8Kraft,Kenneth,and Hage,Jerald,1990.Strategy,Social Responsibility and Implementation[J].Journal of Business Ethics,9:11-19.
  • 9Ray Ball,S.P.Kothari,Ashok Robin,2001.The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics 29:1-51.
  • 10Watts and Zimmerman,1978.Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards[J].Accounting Review,53:112-134.

共引文献34

同被引文献70

引证文献15

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部