摘要
目的观察药物铺灸疗法与常规西药治疗小儿泄泻的疗效差异。方法将60例患者随机分为铺灸组(28例)和西药组(32例)。铺灸组采用中药外敷配合铺灸疗法治疗;西药组口服西药思密达。治疗1个疗程后,比较两组疗效。结果铺灸组的愈显率为71.43%,对照组的愈显率为25.00%。经统计学处理,两组愈显率比较差异有统计意义(P<0.05)。结论药物铺灸疗法治疗小儿泄泻疗效优于思密达,且符合患儿不愿吃药或不愿配合针灸治疗的心愿,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare therapeutic effects of Long Snake Moxibustion method as a treated group and Smeeta as a control group on infantile diarrhea. Methods Sixty cases were randomly divided into Long Snake Moxibustion method group (n = 28 ) and the control group (n = 32). The treated group used long Snake Moxibustion combination external application of Chinese medicine; And the control group were treated with oral administration of Smecta. After treated for 1 course, their therapeutic effects were compared by statis- tics. Results The cured-markedly effective rate was 71.43 % in the Long Snake Moxibustion method group, and 25.00 % in the control group, with a significant difference in the cured-markedly effective rate (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of the Long Snake Moxibustion method group is significantly bet- ter than that of the control group with lower recurrence rate, worthy to be popularized.
出处
《中医儿科杂志》
2010年第2期45-48,共4页
Journal of Pediatrics of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
小儿泄泻
药物铺灸疗法
针灸疗法
Long Snake Moxibustion plus herbal medicine method
infantile diarrhea
acupuncture therapy